It’s the ultimate Catch-22 of the 2020s. You spend four years—and likely a small fortune—earning a degree, only to open LinkedIn and find that every "Junior Analyst" or "Associate Coordinator" role demands three years of relevant work history. It feels like a prank. Honestly, it’s enough to make anyone want to throw their laptop out a window. You need a job to get experience, but you need experience to get the job.
So, why do entry level jobs require experience in a market that claims to be desperate for talent?
The answer isn't a single corporate conspiracy. It’s a messy mix of risk aversion, the "Great Resignation" aftermath, and a fundamental shift in how companies view training. In the past, companies like IBM or General Electric took pride in their multi-year training programs. They hired for "potential." Today? Most firms want a plug-and-play human who can hit the ground running on Tuesday morning without needing a manual for the CRM.
The Risk Aversion Trap and the Cost of a Bad Hire
Hiring is expensive. Extremely expensive. According to data from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), the average cost-per-hire is nearly $4,700, but many recruiters argue that for specialized roles, the true cost of onboarding and lost productivity is closer to three or four times the employee's salary.
✨ Don't miss: 14000 Thai Baht USD: What This Amount Actually Gets You in Thailand Today
Companies are terrified of "mis-hires."
When a hiring manager looks at a stack of 500 resumes for a single social media coordinator role, they aren't looking for the most passionate candidate. They’re looking for the safest one. A candidate who has already done the job elsewhere—even if only for a year—is a proven commodity. They won’t accidentally delete the company’s main database or post a personal meme to the corporate Twitter account. Experience acts as a de facto insurance policy.
The Inflation of Job Titles
We have to talk about "Title Inflation." This is a huge reason why the keyword "entry-level" has lost its original meaning.
In many industries, what used to be called "Assistant" is now "Junior Associate." What was "Junior" is now "Mid-level." Because of this shift, the "Entry Level" tag in LinkedIn filters often catches roles that are actually intended for people with 12 to 24 months of experience. Recruiters often use these tags lazily. They might click "Entry Level" because the pay scale is at the bottom of their budget, even if the workload requires a seasoned pro.
It sucks. It really does. But knowing that the label is often a mistake—not a hard barrier—is the first step to navigating the mess.
The Death of the Formal Training Program
If you ask your parents how they got their first job, they might tell you about a "rotational program" or a six-month "trainee" period. Those are dying out. Outside of high-finance (think Goldman Sachs) or big tech (think Google's APM program), few companies invest in teaching the basics.
They expect the education system to do it.
But there is a massive gap between a Marketing 101 textbook and running a $50,000-a-month Google Ads campaign. Because companies have slashed their internal training budgets, they outsource the training cost to you. They expect you to have figured it out via internships, freelance gigs, or high-level campus projects before you even apply.
The "Invisible" Candidates and Referral Networks
Why do entry level jobs require experience when there are so many graduates? Because of the volume.
The internet made applying for jobs too easy. One-click applies mean a single role gets 1,000+ applicants. Recruiters can't read 1,000 resumes. They use Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) to filter for keywords. "Experience" is the easiest filter to set. If the software can instantly cut 800 people who have zero years of experience, the recruiter's life gets easier, even if they end up ignoring a brilliant, highly capable "green" candidate.
How to Break the Loop: A Strategy That Actually Works
If you're staring at a "3+ years experience required" wall, you have to stop playing by the standard rules. You can't just "apply harder." You have to change what you're offering.
1. Count Everything as Experience
Relevant experience doesn't just mean a 9-to-5 job with a cubicle. Did you run the treasury for your sorority? That’s budget management. Did you manage a Discord server with 5,000 members? That’s community management and conflict resolution. If you built a website for your uncle’s landscaping business, that’s a freelance project. Stop discounting your own labor just because it didn't come with a W-2 form.
✨ Don't miss: Do They Still Make TaB Cola? The Truth About Its Disappearance
2. The Portfolio Over the Resume
For many roles—design, coding, writing, marketing—the "experience" requirement is actually a "proof of competence" requirement. If you can show a portfolio of work that is better than the person with two years of mediocre experience, you win. Build a "Proof of Work" document. Show, don't just tell.
3. Target Smaller Firms
Big brands (the Disneys and Nikes of the world) can afford to be picky. They have an endless supply of overqualified applicants. Small to mid-sized businesses? They are often struggling to find anyone who is competent and reliable. They are much more likely to waive the "2 years experience" requirement if you show up with a great attitude and a clear understanding of their specific business problems.
4. Use the "Side Door"
Networking sounds like a chore, but it's the only way to bypass the ATS filters. Find someone at the company who graduated from your school. Ask for a 15-minute "informational interview" about their career path. Don't ask for a job. Ask for advice. Often, that conversation leads to: "You know, we actually have an opening, let me send your resume to the hiring manager." Suddenly, that "3-year requirement" disappears because a human being vouched for you.
A Final Reality Check
The job market is currently in a state of flux. While it feels like the world is against new grads, the reality is that "Entry Level" has become a spectrum. Some companies use it to mean "low pay," while others use it to mean "no experience." Your job is to decode which is which.
💡 You might also like: Tipo de cambio del dólar en México: Por qué el peso ya no se comporta como antes
Don't let a "2 years experience" requirement stop you from applying if you meet 70% of the other criteria. Job descriptions are often "wish lists," not "must-haves." If you can prove you can solve the company’s problems, the years on the clock matter a lot less than you think.
Immediate Next Steps for Job Seekers:
- Audit your resume: Convert every "extracurricular" or "volunteer" role into a results-oriented experience block using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result).
- Identify 10 "B-tier" companies: Look for firms in your industry that aren't household names; they are significantly more likely to hire for potential over experience.
- Build a "living portfolio": Use platforms like GitHub, Behance, or even a personal Notion page to document projects you've completed, proving you have the skills despite the lack of a formal title.
- Ignore the "years of experience" filter: If you have the skills to do the tasks listed in the job description, apply anyway—but back it up with a personalized cover letter that addresses their specific needs.