You know that feeling when you finish a book and everyone else is raving about the "deep symbolism," but all you saw was a guy catching a fish or a woman staring out a window? It’s frustrating. Honestly, it makes you feel like you missed the party.
But here’s the thing: reading isn't a magic trick. It's more like a secret handshake. Thomas C. Foster basically blew the lid off this back in 2003 with his book, and people are still obsessed with the idea of how to read literature like a professor because it turns out those "hidden" meanings aren't actually hidden. They’re just coded. Professors aren't smarter than you; they've just spent way too much time looking at the patterns. They’ve seen the same "stormy night" three thousand times, and they know it’s never just about the rain.
It’s All One Big Story
If you want to understand literature, you have to accept a weird truth: there is no such thing as a 100% original work of literature. Everything is connected.
💡 You might also like: Why the Color Purple Still Feels Like Royalty (and Why We're Obsessed)
Foster calls this "intertextuality." It’s a fancy word for saying that every book is just a conversation with the books that came before it. When you’re learning how to read literature like a professor, your first job is to stop looking at a novel as a vacuum. Think of it like a giant soup that’s been simmering for centuries. Every writer adds a little salt or a new vegetable, but the base broth is the same.
Take The Lion King. If you’ve read Hamlet, you’re not just watching lions; you’re watching a Shakespearean tragedy with fur. If you didn't know about the Shakespeare connection, the movie is still fine, but knowing it adds this heavy layer of fate and inevitable doom that makes the story vibrate. That’s the "aha!" moment professors live for.
The Myth of the "Normal" Weather Report
Let's talk about rain. In real life, rain is a nuisance that ruins your hair. In a book? Rain is almost always a baptism or a cleansing. Or maybe it’s a drowning.
If a character walks through a storm and comes out the other side, they’ve been reborn. They are literally being washed of their old self. Conversely, if the rain is cold and muddy, it might represent a loss of hope or a "fall" from grace. This is a core tenet of how to read literature like a professor: nothing is accidental. An author doesn't spend three paragraphs describing a drizzle because they’re obsessed with meteorology. They do it because they want you to feel the spiritual shift in the room.
Snow is the same way. It can be cozy and inviting, or it can be the great equalizer that covers everything in a cold, uniform death. Think about the ending of James Joyce's The Dead. The snow is falling on everyone—the living and the deceased. It levels the playing field. It’s quiet. It’s final.
Communion is Rarely Just About Food
Whenever people sit down to eat in a book, it’s a big deal.
🔗 Read more: Why Images of Beautiful Redheads Are Harder to Get Right Than You Think
Foster argues that every meal is an act of communion. It doesn't have to be religious. It’s just about sharing. If people are eating together, they are forming a bond. If the meal goes poorly—someone chokes, or they argue, or the food is rotten—it’s a massive red flag that the community is broken.
In Raymond Carver's famous short story "A Small, Good Thing," the act of eating bread becomes a literal lifeline for parents mourning their son. It’s not just carbs; it’s the only thing keeping them tethered to the world. On the flip side, look at some of the dinner scenes in The Great Gatsby. They’re awkward, tense, and often interrupted. That’s Fitzgerald telling you that these people don’t actually like each other. They’re just consuming things in the same space.
The Geography of the Soul
Landscape isn't just a backdrop. It's a character.
In the world of professional reading, geography is about more than just where the characters are on a map. It’s about what that place does to them. When characters go "south," it’s usually so they can run wild or find their raw, uninhibited selves. Think about Heart of Darkness or even a modern road trip movie. Going "down" is often a descent into the subconscious.
Mountains? Those are for clarity. If a character climbs a peak, they’re probably going to have a revelation or a "Sermon on the Mount" moment. Valleys are for swamps, fog, and getting lost. If you see a character heading into a marsh, don't expect them to have a great Tuesday.
Vampires Aren't Always Pale Guys with Capes
This is where it gets a little dark. Literature is full of vampires, but most of them don't have fangs.
The "vampiric" figure in literature is really about exploitation. It’s an older, established person sucking the life, youth, or energy out of someone younger and more innocent. This happens in Victorian novels all the time, but it’s just as common in modern corporate thrillers. If someone is using another person to sustain their own power or social standing, you’re looking at a literary vampire.
It’s about the "ghastly" nature of human relationships where one person thrives at the expense of another. Once you see it, you can’t un-see it. You start realizing that the "mean boss" trope is actually a centuries-old tradition of psychic parasitism.
Why Symbols are a Rorschach Test
The biggest mistake people make is thinking a symbol has one "correct" meaning.
"What does the white whale mean?"
The answer is: what doesn't it mean?
💡 You might also like: Why Every Homeowner Needs a Trigger Start Propane Torch (and Why Some Cheap Ones Suck)
To Ahab, Moby Dick is the devil. To Starbuck, it’s just a big fish. To a reader, it might be God, or nature, or the void of the universe. Symbols aren't math problems. They don't have an equals sign. Instead, they are "polysemic," which is a fancy way of saying they have multiple meanings at the same time.
If a symbol only meant one thing, it would be an allegory. (Think Animal Farm—the pigs are the Bolsheviks. Done. Easy.) But true symbols stay messy. They’re meant to make you feel a range of conflicting things. If you’re trying to figure out how to read literature like a professor, don't look for the "answer." Look for the possibilities.
Actionable Steps for Your Next Book
You don't need a PhD to start doing this tonight. It’s just a shift in mindset.
- Look for the "Double." If two characters are weirdly similar or total opposites, they’re probably two sides of the same coin. This is the "Doppelganger" effect.
- Check the scars. If a character has a physical deformity or a prominent scar (think Harry Potter or Ethan Frome), it’s usually a reflection of a psychological or spiritual wound. It’s a marker of being "different" or "marked by fate."
- Question the "Christ Figure." Is a character 33 years old? Do they have wounds in their hands or feet? Are they self-sacrificing? Do they spend time in a "wilderness"? Authors love using the Christ archetype to signal that a character is carrying the weight of their society.
- Note the exits and entrances. How a character enters a room tells you everything about their power status. Do they burst in? Do they creep? If they fall into a body of water, they are being reborn. If they walk through a doorway and the light changes, pay attention.
The goal isn't to over-analyze a book until it’s dead and boring. It’s the opposite. It’s about seeing the layers of history and human experience that make a story feel "heavy" and important. When you start noticing that the "random" thunderstorm happens right when the hero loses his job, you aren't just reading words anymore. You're participating in a ritual that’s as old as storytelling itself.
Next time you pick up a novel, stop asking "What happens next?" and start asking "Where have I seen this before?" That's the secret. That's how the "magic" actually works.