Why is Trump Putting Tariffs on China: What Most People Get Wrong

Why is Trump Putting Tariffs on China: What Most People Get Wrong

You’ve probably seen the headlines or felt the sting at the checkout counter lately. The trade war isn't just a leftover from 2018; it’s basically the cornerstone of the current administration’s economic identity in 2026. If you're wondering why is Trump putting tariffs on China with such renewed intensity, the answer isn't just "taxes." It’s a messy, high-stakes cocktail of national security, a desperate push for a manufacturing "renaissance," and a very specific, aggressive use of executive power.

Honestly, the logic from the White House is pretty straightforward, even if the math makes economists sweat. They see the U.S. as being "ripped off" by a lopsided trade relationship. But by early 2026, the strategy has evolved into something much more complex than just making sneakers more expensive.

📖 Related: Dow Jones yesterday close: Why the blue chips are acting so weird lately

The "Fentanyl Factor" and National Emergencies

One of the most surprising twists in the 2025-2026 tariff cycle has been the shift from purely economic justifications to "national emergency" declarations. Trump has used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to bypass a lot of the usual red tape.

Back in February 2025, a 10% tariff was slapped on Chinese imports specifically as a "punishment" for Beijing’s perceived failure to stop the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals. This wasn't just about trade balances; it was framed as a direct strike against a public health crisis. By late 2025, the administration actually lowered these specific "fentanyl tariffs" by 10 percentage points as part of a temporary truce, but the precedent was set: tariffs are now a tool for social and moral leverage, not just business.

Why the White House Loves the "Most Beautiful Word"

Trump famously called "tariff" the most beautiful word in the dictionary. To his team, led by influential voices like Robert Lighthizer, these levies serve three main purposes that they believe outweigh the risk of inflation:

🔗 Read more: Natco Pharma Limited share price: Why investors are glued to the screen

  • Forcing "Selective Decoupling": They want to break the "dangerous addiction" to Chinese supply chains. This is why we see 25% tariffs on advanced AI chips and targeted hits on rare earth minerals. They want the U.S. to be self-reliant, especially if a "hot war" ever became a reality.
  • The Revenue Pipe Dream: There’s been a lot of talk in D.C. about tariff revenue eventually replacing income taxes for people making under $200,000. While most experts say the math doesn't even come close to working, the administration uses the roughly $300 billion collected in 2025 as a proof of concept.
  • Reciprocity as Fairness: The "Reciprocal Trade Act" logic is basically "if you charge us 20%, we charge you 20%." It’s an eye-for-an-eye approach to global commerce that ignores the fact that U.S. consumers often end up paying the bill.

The 2026 Reality: A Fragile Truce

As of January 2026, we’re living in a period of "suspended escalation." Following a historic deal struck in late 2025, the U.S. agreed to pause some of the most extreme "reciprocal" tariffs—some of which were threatened to hit 145%—until November 10, 2026.

In exchange, China promised to buy massive amounts of American soybeans (12 million metric tons in late 2025 alone) and to stop its own retaliation against U.S. chipmakers. It’s a "wait and see" game. The baseline 10% tariff remains in place, acting as a permanent floor for all Chinese goods entering the country.

Does This Actually Help American Workers?

This is where it gets kind of complicated. If you ask a steelworker in Pennsylvania, they might tell you the protection is a godsend. But for a tech startup in Austin or a farmer in Iowa, the story is different.

The Tax Foundation pointed out that these tariffs could reduce U.S. GDP by 0.5% and cost over 500,000 jobs due to higher production costs. Businesses aren't just eating these costs; they're passing them on. Middle-income households are looking at an extra $1,500 in costs this year alone.

But the administration’s gamble is that this "short-term pain" will force companies to build factories in the U.S. instead of Shenzhen. They’re betting that a "manufacturing renaissance" is worth the higher price of a toaster or a laptop.

If you’re a business owner or just a concerned consumer, you can’t just ignore the "tariff wall." Here is how the landscape is shifting:

  1. Watch the "De Minimis" Loophole: The administration effectively killed the $800 exemption for small packages (think Temu or Shein orders) in August 2025. Expect prices on direct-from-China e-commerce to stay high.
  2. Diversify Beyond China: The "China Plus One" strategy is no longer optional. Moving assembly to Vietnam, Mexico, or India is the only way many firms are surviving the 27% average effective tariff rate.
  3. Anticipate the November 2026 Deadline: The current "truce" has a hard expiration date. If China doesn't meet its soybean and fentanyl commitments, expect the "reciprocal" rates (some hitting 60% or higher) to snap back instantly.
  4. Audit Your Supply Chain for "Transshipment": The U.S. is getting aggressive about catching Chinese goods routed through ASEAN countries to avoid duties. Don't get caught in a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) audit.

The trade war isn't a single event; it's the new normal. Whether it’s about "protecting global peace" by taxing countries that move into Greenland or trying to reset the balance with Beijing, the 2026 trade policy is all about using the U.S. market as a blunt force instrument. It’s messy, it’s expensive, and honestly, it’s just getting started.

Actionable Next Steps: * Check the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS): If you import, use the latest 2026 revisions to see if your specific product codes fall under the Section 301 or IEEPA "national emergency" categories.

  • Monitor the Supreme Court: A ruling is expected soon regarding whether the President actually has the constitutional authority to use the IEEPA for blanket tariffs. This could change everything overnight.