Peter Jackson didn't just want Martin Freeman. He was obsessed with him. Honestly, the story of how Martin Freeman became Bilbo Baggins is less about a standard casting call and more about a director refusing to take "no" for an answer. Jackson famously said there was nobody else. If Freeman couldn't do it, the movie was basically in trouble before it started. It’s rare for a multi-billion dollar franchise to hang its entire existence on one guy’s availability, but that’s exactly what happened with The Hobbit trilogy.
You’ve probably heard the rumors. The production actually shut down. Well, not shut down, but they restructured the entire filming schedule to accommodate Freeman’s commitments to Sherlock. It cost a fortune. But looking back at those three films, could you really imagine anyone else doing that specific "Hobbity" twitch?
The "Everyman" Magic of Martin Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins
What makes Martin Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins so distinct from Ian Holm’s version in The Lord of the Rings isn’t just the age difference. It’s the vibe. Holm played Bilbo as a man already touched by the Ring—a bit eccentric, weary, and ultimately heavy. Freeman had to play the "before" picture. He had to be the guy who likes his doilies and his seed cakes and has absolutely zero interest in dragons.
Freeman has this weirdly specific talent for being "aggressively normal." Whether it’s Tim in The Office (the UK original) or John Watson, he excels at playing the person who is slightly annoyed by the chaos around them. That’s Bilbo. Bilbo isn't a hero. He's a bourgeois country gentleman who gets kidnapped by a wizard and thirteen dwarves.
If you watch the first act of An Unexpected Journey, pay attention to his hands. Freeman uses his hands constantly to convey discomfort. It’s a masterclass in physical acting that doesn't feel like "acting." He fusses. He adjusts his waistcoat. He looks for a napkin in the middle of a crisis. This is what Tolkien meant by the "homely" nature of Hobbits. They aren't warriors. They are people who care about whether the tea is cold.
Why the Casting Almost Failed
It almost didn't happen because of the BBC. Sherlock was a massive hit, and the filming schedules for the second season overlapped perfectly with the start of The Hobbit. Freeman actually turned the role down. Can you imagine? Turning down the lead in a Middle-earth prequel.
👉 See also: Kathy Mattea Where’ve You Been: The Heartbreaking True Story Behind the Song
He felt he had to stay loyal to the show that had revitalized his career. Most actors would have just said, "Sorry, Peter, maybe next time." But Peter Jackson saw the screen tests. He saw the way Freeman could deliver a line with a slight stammer and a look of bewildered frustration. Jackson convinced Warner Bros. to move the schedule. They broke filming into blocks so Freeman could fly back to London, film Sherlock, and then fly back to New Zealand.
This level of commitment to a single actor is unheard of in modern blockbusters. It speaks to the "E-E-A-T" (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) that Jackson felt Freeman brought to the character. Freeman wasn't just an actor; he was the physical embodiment of a literary archetype.
Translating the Book to the Screen
There is a huge difference between the Bilbo in the book and the one on screen. In the book, Bilbo is often a passenger for the first half of the story. He’s the "lucky number," sure, but he doesn't have a lot of agency. In the films, Martin Freeman had to make Bilbo feel like he was earning his place.
Take the scene with Gollum. "Riddles in the Dark."
It’s arguably the most important scene in the entire Tolkien legendarium. If that scene fails, the whole six-movie arc collapses. Freeman and Andy Serkis filmed that scene almost like a stage play. They did long takes. They let the tension simmer. Freeman’s Bilbo here is terrified, but he’s also smart. You see the wheels turning behind his eyes. When he chooses not to kill Gollum—that moment of pity—it has to feel earned. Freeman plays it with a subtle catch in his breath. It’s not a grand gesture. It’s a quiet realization.
- The Physicality: Freeman developed a specific walk for Bilbo. It’s a bit heavy on the heels, suggested by the prosthetic feet, but also cautious.
- The Voice: He kept his natural accent but clipped the consonants to sound more "Shire-ish."
- The Emotional Core: He’s the only one who really grounds the dwarves. Without Bilbo’s normalcy, the dwarves are just a bunch of loud guys in prosthetics.
The Complexity of the Bagginshield Dynamic
Fans often talk about "Bagginshield"—the relationship between Bilbo and Thorin Oakenshield (played by Richard Armitage). While the internet has its own interpretations, the professional chemistry between Freeman and Armitage is what makes the third film, The Battle of the Five Armies, actually work.
Bilbo has to betray Thorin. He steals the Arkenstone. To make that betrayal feel like an act of love rather than a theft, you need an actor who can project internal conflict without saying a word. Freeman does this through his eyes. He looks devastated even when he's doing what he knows is right. It’s a nuanced performance that often gets overlooked because there’s a giant CGI dragon on screen.
Technical Challenges on Set
Filming The Hobbit was a nightmare for the actors' comfort. Because of the "Slave Motion Control" (a technique where characters of different sizes are filmed on separate sets simultaneously), Freeman often had to act with nobody there.
He’d be in a green-box room, looking at a tennis ball on a stick, while Ian McKellen was on a completely different set. He had to match the timing, the eye-lines, and the emotional energy of a person who wasn't in the room. This is where Freeman’s background in theater and his technical precision really saved the production.
He didn't have the luxury of reacting to his co-stars in real-time for many of the most iconic scenes. He had to "build" the scene in his head.
"It’s a very lonely way of working," Freeman once remarked during a press tour. "You’re talking to a lightbulb and trying to remember that this lightbulb is supposed to be your best friend who just betrayed you."
Dealing with the Prosthetics
Let's talk about the feet. And the ears. And the wigs. Freeman spent hours in the makeup chair every single day for years. The Hobbit feet are notoriously difficult to walk in. They’re like giant, heavy slippers that are glued to your skin.
💡 You might also like: I Know What You Did Last Summer: Why This Slasher Still Hits Different 27 Years Later
Freeman has mentioned in interviews that the hardest part wasn't the weight, but the heat. New Zealand summers are no joke, and when you’re wrapped in wool, velvet, and silicone, you’re basically a human microwave. Yet, you never see that discomfort on screen. Bilbo looks "lived-in." His clothes look like they belong to him.
What Most People Get Wrong About His Performance
A common criticism of The Hobbit trilogy is that it's too long and relies too much on CGI. That might be true. But people often lump the acting in with the technical gripes. That’s a mistake.
If you strip away the gold-breathing dragons and the weird rabbit-sleds, you’re left with a very human story about a guy who realizes that the world is much bigger and scarier than his living room. Martin Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins is the anchor.
He isn't playing a fantasy character. He's playing a real person in a fantasy situation. That’s the "secret sauce." If he had played it "epic" or "legendary," the character would have been boring. By playing it small, he made the story feel big.
Real Evidence of His Impact
Look at the reviews from 2012 versus now. Even critics who hated the high-frame-rate (48fps) or the padded plot points almost universally praised Freeman.
- The Guardian called him "perfectly cast."
- Empire Magazine noted that he "carries the emotional weight of the trilogy."
- Total Film pointed out that his chemistry with Gollum was the highlight of the entire series.
He brought a level of British "dryness" that balanced out the more operatic elements of the story. Without that balance, the movies would have felt too much like a video game.
✨ Don't miss: Why Mr. Blandings Dream House Movie is Still the Best Warning for Homeowners
Actionable Takeaways for Fans and Actors
If you're looking at Freeman's work as a study in acting or just trying to appreciate the craft more, there are specific things to watch for.
- Watch the "Quiet" Moments: In The Desolation of Smaug, look at his face when he first sees the hoard of gold. It’s not just greed; it’s overwhelming sensory overload.
- Study the Reaction Shots: Freeman is often more interesting when he's not talking. His reactions to the dwarves destroying his kitchen are funnier than the actual dialogue.
- The Evolution of the Voice: Notice how Bilbo’s voice gets deeper and more confident by the third movie. It’s a subtle shift in pitch that shows his growth as a character.
- Compare to the Book: Read the "Riddles in the Dark" chapter and then watch the scene. See how Freeman incorporates the "pity of Bilbo" that Gandalf talks about later.
The Legacy of the Performance
Years later, Martin Freeman’s Bilbo Baggins stands as one of the most successful "prequel" castings in cinema history. It’s up there with Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan Kenobi. He took a character we already knew the ending for and made us care about the beginning.
He didn't try to imitate Ian Holm. He didn't try to be a generic hero. He was just Bilbo. A slightly grumpy, very terrified, incredibly brave little person who just wanted to go home, but stayed because his friends didn't have one.
To truly appreciate the performance, you have to look past the CGI orcs. Look at the Hobbit who is just trying to keep his handkerchief clean while the world ends. That's the heart of the story. Freeman found that heart and kept it beating for nine hours of film.
Next Steps for Deepening Your Middle-earth Knowledge:
To get the full picture of how this character was built, seek out the "Production Diaries" on the extended edition Blu-rays. Unlike standard "making-of" featurettes, these were filmed in real-time during production and show the grueling nature of the shoot. You can also track Freeman's specific acting choices by watching the 1977 animated Hobbit and comparing how different actors interpret Bilbo’s "internal monologue" versus Freeman’s externalized facial expressions. Understanding the "Slave Mo-Cap" technology used in the Smaug scenes will also give you a new appreciation for the technical hurdles Freeman cleared while maintaining his performance.