Hollywood loves a remake. It's the industry's favorite security blanket. But when people talk about the "classic" version of this story, they usually get into a heated debate between the 1954 Judy Garland powerhouse and the 2018 Gaga-Cooper hit. Somewhere in the middle sits the 1976 version—the Barbra Streisand A Star Is Born.
It’s messy. It’s loud. It’s incredibly 70s.
Critics at the time basically tried to bury it. They called it a vanity project. They mocked the hair. They hated how much control Streisand took over the production. Yet, despite the vitriol from the press, the movie was a massive, undeniable juggernaut at the box office. It became the second highest-grossing film of 1976. People didn’t just watch it; they lived it.
The Chaos Behind the Scenes of the 1976 Remake
The production was a literal battlefield.
Streisand wasn't just the star; she was the engine, the producer, and, many would argue, the unofficial director. She clashed with director Frank Pierson constantly. Pierson eventually got so fed up that he wrote a scathing, tell-all essay for New West magazine before the movie even hit theaters. He titled it "My Battles with Barbra and Jon," referring to Streisand and her then-partner/producer Jon Peters.
Talk about bad PR.
Peters was a former hairdresser with zero film production experience before this. That didn't stop him from being a dominant force on set. The tension wasn't just between the crew and the star, though. Kris Kristofferson, who played the self-destructing rock star John Norman Howard, was reportedly drinking heavily during the shoot—mirroring his character in a way that felt a little too real for comfort.
Streisand was a perfectionist. Kristofferson was... not.
She wanted to rehearse every beat. He wanted to feel the moment and move on. You can see that friction on screen. Honestly, it’s part of what makes their chemistry work. It feels raw because the people making it were actually annoyed with each other half the time.
Why the 1976 Setting Changed Everything
Before this version, the story was always about the movie business.
In 1937 and 1954, it was an actress rising while an actor fell. Streisand and her team realized the 70s didn't care about old-school Hollywood glamor anymore. They cared about rock and roll.
So, Esther Hoffman became a singer. John Norman Howard became a fading stadium rocker. This shift allowed the movie to tap into the "rock star mythos" that was peaking at the time. They filmed at real music festivals, like the Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe, Arizona, in front of 70,000 actual fans who were there to see Peter Frampton and Santana.
The crowd was told they’d get a free concert if they stayed to be extras.
It worked.
The scale of the Barbra Streisand A Star Is Born feels massive because those crowds aren't CGI. They are real people baked in the Arizona sun, watching Streisand belt out "Evergreen" live.
The "Evergreen" Legacy and the Oscar Win
You can't talk about this movie without talking about the music.
Specifically, "Evergreen (Love Theme from A Star Is Born)."
Streisand composed the melody herself. This was a huge deal. At the time, women weren't really "supposed" to be composers in the eyes of the Academy or the industry at large. She proved them wrong. When she won the Academy Award for Best Original Song, she became the first woman to ever win an Oscar for composing music.
That song stayed at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 for weeks.
It defined a decade of weddings.
Even if you hate the movie's plot—which, let's be real, is a bit of a melodrama slog in the second act—you cannot deny the power of that soundtrack. It sold 15 million copies. Paul Williams, who co-wrote the lyrics, helped craft a sound that felt both contemporary for 1976 and timeless enough to survive the disco era.
What Modern Audiences Get Wrong About Streisand’s Esther
A common complaint about this version is that Streisand is "too successful" from the start.
In the Gaga version, Ally is a waitress who doesn't believe in herself. In the Garland version, Esther Blodgett is a struggling band singer. But Barbra? Barbra enters the frame with a voice that sounds like it already owns the world.
Some say this ruins the "rise to fame" arc.
I disagree.
The Barbra Streisand A Star Is Born is less about a girl discovering her talent and more about a woman navigating the ego of a man who can't handle her light. It’s a power struggle. Streisand’s Esther is fierce. She isn't a waif waiting to be discovered; she’s a pro who just needs a break.
The tragedy isn't that she changes; it's that he refuses to.
The Wardrobe Controversy
Fun fact: Barbra Streisand wore her own clothes in the movie.
The credits actually say "Wardrobe from Barbra Streisand's Closet."
Critics used this as more ammunition for the "vanity project" argument. They felt it was lazy or self-indulgent. But looking back, it gave the film a specific, grounded aesthetic. It felt like the 70s because it was the 70s. The afghans, the perms, the high-waisted denim—it wasn't a costume designer's "interpretation" of a singer. It was just Barbra.
Comparing the Streisand Version to the 2018 Bradley Cooper Film
If you've only seen the Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga version, the 1976 film might feel jarring.
The 2018 version is much more focused on the grit of addiction. It’s darker. It’s quieter. Cooper’s Jackson Maine is a soulful, gravelly-voiced tragic figure. Kristofferson’s John Norman Howard is more of a wild man, a destructive force of nature who rides motorcycles into the sunset (literally).
But the DNA is the same.
The "nose" scene? That's in the 1976 version.
The bathtub scene? Yep, Streisand did it first.
The 2018 film is essentially a love letter to the 1976 version, far more than it is to the 1937 or 1954 versions. Bradley Cooper has even talked about how he consulted with Streisand during the process. She even visited the set.
The Brutal Reality of the Reviews
It’s worth noting just how much the critics hated this thing.
The New York Times called it "a bore." The New Yorker was even meaner. There was a weirdly gendered aggression in the reviews. Critics seemed offended that a woman—especially a Jewish woman with a "difficult" reputation—had the audacity to produce, star in, and write the music for a multi-million dollar blockbuster.
They wanted her to stay in her lane.
She didn't.
And the public rewarded her for it. The film was a cultural phenomenon. It proved that "the Streisand brand" was bigger than the critics' opinions. It paved the way for other female stars to take the reins of their own careers.
Why You Should Actually Watch It Now
Is it perfect? No.
The pacing is weird. The ending is abrupt. The 1970s "rock" sound might feel a little "easy listening" to modern ears used to actual grunge or heavy metal.
But the Barbra Streisand A Star Is Born is a fascinating time capsule. It captures a moment when rock music was becoming corporate, when Hollywood was transitioning from the "New Hollywood" era of the early 70s into the blockbuster era of the late 70s.
👉 See also: Kahn Souphanousinphone: What Most People Get Wrong About the King of the Hill Legend
It’s also a masterclass in star power.
You watch it because you can't look away from her. Whether she's singing "Woman in the Moon" or arguing with Kristofferson in a half-built house in the desert, Streisand is magnetic.
Key Takeaways for the Film Buff
If you're planning a rewatch or seeing it for the first time, keep these things in mind:
- Look at the lighting. Vilmos Zsigmond, the cinematographer, used a lot of natural light and "flashing" techniques that give the film a hazy, dreamlike quality.
- Listen for the live vocals. Unlike many musicals of the era, much of the singing was recorded live on set to capture the energy of the performances.
- Notice the gender dynamics. This Esther Hoffman is arguably the most independent and vocal of all the versions. She doesn't just take the fame; she earns it on her own terms.
To truly understand the history of the American musical, you have to grapple with this movie. It isn't just a remake; it’s a statement of intent from one of the most powerful women in entertainment history.
Next Steps for Deep Diving into the 1976 Classic:
First, go listen to the original soundtrack on vinyl if you can find it. The analog warmth does wonders for Kristofferson's voice and helps you appreciate the layering in "Evergreen." Second, track down the Frank Pierson essay from 1976. It’s a masterclass in Hollywood "tea" and provides a hilarious, if biased, look at what it was like to work with Barbra at the height of her powers. Finally, compare the final "Watch Closely Now" medley to the ending of the other versions. It’s the only one that feels like a rock concert instead of a funeral, and that choice says everything about the 1976 mindset.