If you spent any time near a television in the early nineties, you probably remember the theme song. That jaunty, ragtime-infused woodwind melody. It signaled the start of The House of Eliott, a show that somehow managed to make the gritty business of dressmaking look like a high-stakes thriller. Honestly, it's kind of wild how well it holds up. Most period dramas from 1991 feel like they’re covered in a layer of dust, but there’s something about the way Jean Marsh and Eileen Atkins—the creators behind Upstairs, Downstairs—approached this story that keeps it feeling fresh.
It wasn't just about the clothes.
Sure, the flapper dresses were stunning. The cloche hats were perfect. But at its heart, the show was a gritty look at two sisters, Beatrice and Evangeline Eliott, who were basically left with nothing after their father died. No money. No status. Just a talent for design and a desperate need to stay independent in a world that really, really wanted them to just get married and go away. It’s a business story wrapped in silk and chiffon.
💡 You might also like: Kirk Franklin BET Performance: Why Everyone Is Still Talking About the 2025 Ultimate Icon Moment
The Reality of 1920s Fashion Entrepreneurs
Most people think of the Roaring Twenties as one big party. Great Gatsby vibes, right? But for the Eliott sisters, the reality was much tougher. They were trying to build a couture house from scratch without any seed capital.
The show did a great job of showing the class divide. You had the wealthy clients who were often incredibly rude and didn't want to pay their bills, and then you had the "workroom girls." These were the women in the back, squinting over embroidery for pennies. It’s basically the 1920s version of a startup, but with more corsets and fewer energy drinks.
Stella Gonet and Louise Lombard, who played Bea and Evie, had this incredible chemistry. They fought. A lot. They disagreed about designs, they disagreed about men, and they definitely disagreed about how to run a business. But they stayed together because they had to. That’s the core of why The House of Eliott worked so well; it grounded the glamour in a very real, very stressful family dynamic.
Why the costumes weren't just "costumes"
The production design was led by people like Joan Wadge, who actually won a BAFTA for her work on the show. They didn't just go to a costume shop and rent some old dresses. They researched the transition from the restrictive Edwardian silhouettes to the loose, "garçonne" look of the twenties.
You see the evolution on screen.
In the beginning, the sisters are wearing mourning black—heavy, stiff, and miserable. As they find their footing as designers, their clothes start to reflect their freedom. We see the shift to dropped waists and shorter hemlines, which wasn't just a fashion choice; it was a political statement. Women were finally breathing. Literally. They could move their legs. They could dance. They could work.
The Business of Couture: More Than Just Sketching
If you watch closely, the show spends a surprising amount of time on the "boring" parts of fashion that are actually the most interesting. We’re talking about sourcing fabric, managing a payroll, and dealing with the rise of ready-to-wear.
- Fabric Sourcing: Evie and Bea spent half their time hunting for the right silks and laces.
- The Workroom: The show didn't shy away from the labor issues of the time. The seamstresses weren't just background characters; they had lives, problems, and eventually, they wanted rights.
- Expansion: By the third series, they weren't just making custom gowns for Duchesses. They were looking at the American market. They were looking at films.
It’s sort of funny how little has changed. Today’s designers are still obsessed with the same things: "How do I scale my brand without losing the soul of the design?" The Eliott sisters were asking that in 1924.
The controversial ending (and why it still stings)
Okay, we have to talk about the finale. Or the lack thereof.
The BBC cancelled the show after three seasons. It ended on a massive cliffhanger. Bea and Evie were at a crossroads, both personally and professionally. Fans were—and still are—absolutely furious about it. There was talk for years about a movie or a special to wrap things up, but it never happened.
Jean Marsh has mentioned in various interviews over the years that they had plans. They wanted to take the sisters into the 1930s, into the Great Depression, to see how a luxury brand survives when the world is falling apart. We never got to see that. Instead, we’re left with the image of the House of Eliott at its peak, which is perhaps a bit poetic, even if it is frustrating.
👉 See also: Grammy Award for Best Alternative Music Album: What Most People Get Wrong
Lessons for Modern Creatives from the Eliott Sisters
There’s a reason this show still finds new fans on streaming services. It’s a blueprint for anyone trying to make something out of nothing.
First, you have to be obsessive. Bea Eliott didn't just "like" clothes; she understood the architecture of a garment. She knew how a sleeve should hang. Second, you need a partner who balances you out. Evie was the fire, the trend-setter, the one who pushed for the "new." Bea was the anchor, the one who made sure the bills were paid (or at least tried to).
Don't ignore the middleman, either. The character of Jack Maddox, played by Aden Gillett, provided a window into the changing social landscape of London. He was a filmmaker and a socialist, constantly reminding the sisters that there was a world outside their atelier.
How to watch it today
If you want to dive back in, it’s usually available on BritBox or through various BBC archives. It’s worth a rewatch not just for the nostalgia, but to see how much detail went into the scripts. The dialogue is snappy. It doesn't treat the audience like they're stupid. It assumes you care about the difference between a bias cut and a straight grain.
Actionable Steps for Fashion History Enthusiasts
If the story of The House of Eliott inspires you to look deeper into the era, here is how you can actually engage with that history today:
🔗 Read more: I'll Be Your Crying Shoulder: The Surprising History Behind the Phrase That Defined a Decade of Ballads
- Visit the Fashion and Textile Museum: Located in London, they often have exhibitions that cover the exact techniques used in the 1920s workrooms.
- Study the "Big Three" of the Era: To understand where the show got its inspiration, look up the real-life work of Coco Chanel, Elsa Schiaparelli, and Madeleine Vionnet. Vionnet, in particular, was the queen of the bias cut, a technique the Eliott sisters frequently "invented" for their own clients.
- Learn Basic Garment Construction: You don't need to be a pro, but understanding how a 1920s dress is put together (minimal seams, draped shapes) makes watching the show ten times more satisfying.
- Look for "The House of Eliott" Novelizations: If you’re desperate for more, there were books written by Jean Marsh that expand on the world, though they mostly follow the show's plot.
The show remains a masterclass in how to blend history with drama. It taught us that fashion isn't just about vanity. It’s about labor, it’s about identity, and more than anything, it’s about the grit it takes to build something that lasts—even if only in the memories of the viewers.
Next Steps for Your Research:
To get a deeper sense of the era's aesthetic, search for the 1920s Paris International Exhibition of Decorative and Modern Industrial Arts. This was the real-life event that solidified the "Art Deco" style that permeates every frame of the show's final season. Examining the original sketches from that 1925 exhibition will show you exactly where the costume designers found their most "radical" ideas.