Gen Z is currently rediscovering the early 2000s aesthetic with a vengeance. Between the butterfly clips and the low-rise jeans, it was only a matter of time before everyone turned back to the ultimate makeover movie. But if you’re planning a rewatch or introducing it to a new generation, you might find yourself double-checking The Princess Diaries movie rating to see if it actually holds up to modern standards. It’s G. Just a straight-up, rare-as-a-unicorn "General Audiences" rating.
Honestly? That’s weird.
In a world where almost every live-action Disney flick gets a "thematic elements" PG nudge, seeing that green G box feels like a relic from a different era. Garry Marshall, the director behind Pretty Woman, managed to take a book series that was—let’s be real—kind of edgy and hormonal, and sanitize it into something so wholesome it passed the MPAA’s strictest test without breaking a sweat.
Breaking Down the G: What The Princess Diaries Movie Rating Really Means
The MPAA gave The Princess Diaries a G rating back in 2001. This means the board determined the film contains nothing in terms of theme, language, nudity, violence, or drug use that would offend parents whose younger children view the motion picture. It's the "safe" zone.
But "safe" doesn’t always mean "boring."
If you look at the landscape of the early 2000s, Disney was transitioning. They were moving away from the 90s animation renaissance and trying to find their footing in live-action teen comedies. The G rating was a strategic move. It opened the doors for the youngest viewers while the marketing leaned heavily on the "Cinderella story" trope to pull in the teens.
Is there "violence"? Well, Mia Thermopolis (Anne Hathaway) does accidentally hit her gym teacher in the face with a basketball. She also crashes her 1966 Mustang into a cable car in San Francisco. But it’s all played for slapstick. There’s no blood. There’s no real peril. Even the "villains," Lana Thomas (played by a peak-mean-girl Mandy Moore) and the backstabbing Josh Bryant, are mostly guilty of being incredibly rude and shallow rather than actually dangerous.
The Contrast with the Meg Cabot Books
Here is where the nuance kicks in. If you grew up reading Meg Cabot’s original novels, you know the books are definitely not "G-rated" in spirit. The book version of Mia is a neurotic, boy-crazy, swearing-prone New Yorker. The movie version, however, is a clumsy, sweet, and largely innocent girl living in a converted firehouse.
Disney made a conscious choice to pivot.
💡 You might also like: Why Shows Like Leave It to Beaver Still Dominate Our Late-Night Nostalgia
By aiming for that specific The Princess Diaries movie rating, the studio had to strip away the more mature elements of the source material. In the books, Mia’s mom is dating her algebra teacher (who is also Mia's father's best friend), and the dialogue is much more "teen-angst" heavy. The film swaps that for a more regal, almost fairy-tale atmosphere. It worked. The film grossed over $165 million worldwide. You don't hit those numbers in 2001 with a live-action teen movie unless you're capturing the entire family demographic.
Why a G Rating is So Rare Now
You basically never see G-rated live-action movies anymore. Take a look at the live-action Beauty and the Beast or Aladdin—they're all PG. Even the Toy Story sequels eventually bumped up.
So why did The Princess Diaries get the pass?
- Zero Profanity: There isn't even a "hell" or a "damn." The strongest language you'll find is someone being called a "freak" or "invisible."
- Romance is Chaste: We get a "foot-popping" kiss at the end, but it's the pinnacle of innocence. There’s no suggestive dialogue.
- Thematic Heaviness: While Mia deals with the death of her father (which is a change from the book where he’s alive but had cancer), it’s handled with such grace and distance that it doesn't trigger the "thematic elements" warning that usually leads to a PG.
It’s fascinating to see how the MPAA’s internal "vibes" have shifted. Today, a scene where a girl is publicly humiliated in her gym clothes (the beach party scene) might be flagged as "thematic material involving bullying." In 2001, it was just a plot point.
Parental Concerns and Content Nuance
Even with a G rating, parents often have questions. Common Sense Media, which often provides a more granular look than the MPAA, generally suggests the film is fine for ages 6 and up.
The "scariest" thing in the movie is probably the social anxiety.
Mia’s fear of public speaking is palpable. For a kid who deals with stage fright, those scenes might actually be a little stressful. Then there’s the betrayal. When Mia’s "friend" Lilly Moscovitz (Heather Matarazzo) turns on her because Mia is getting too much attention, it’s a real look at the toxicity of middle and high school friendships.
Also, we have to talk about the makeover.
Some critics argue the "G" rating hides a message that's actually a bit harmful: that you need to straighten your hair and get contacts to be "royal" or "worthy." This has been a sticking point in retrospective reviews for years. When Paolo (John Rhys-Davies) "breaks" Mia’s glasses and tames her "frizz," the movie frames it as a victory. In 2026, we’re a lot more sensitive to the idea that natural hair and glasses don't need "fixing." But within the context of The Princess Diaries movie rating, this is considered standard "thematic" fluff.
The Cultural Impact of the Rating
Because the movie was rated G, it became a staple of sleepovers for twenty years. It became a safe bet for teachers to play on the last day of school. It cemented Anne Hathaway as a household name without her having to navigate the "teen starlet" scandals that plagued some of her contemporaries.
It also allowed Julie Andrews to return to the screen in a role that felt like a natural extension of Mary Poppins or Maria von Trapp. Can you imagine Queen Clarisse Renaldi in a PG-13 movie? It wouldn't happen. The rating protected the brand of the actors as much as the movie itself.
Key Factors in the Rating Evaluation:
- Alcohol/Drugs: None. There is a scene at a party, but it's all soft drinks and teenagers acting like idiots.
- Sexual Content: None. Aside from a few crushes and one very famous kiss.
- Violence: Slapstick only.
- Language: Totally clean.
What to Watch Out For (The "Aged" Elements)
Look, 2001 was a different time.
While the rating is clean, there are some "mean girl" tropes that feel a bit dated. The way the cheerleaders are portrayed as mindless, vapid villains is very of its time. The movie also leans hard into the "clumsy girl" trope. Mia is constantly falling, breaking things, or tripping over her own feet. It’s charming, sure, but it’s also the primary source of the movie’s "action."
If you’re watching this with kids today, the most "controversial" part might actually be the paparazzi. The film shows the press as aggressive and invasive. In a post-Britney Spears documentary world, the way the media treats a 15-year-old girl in this film feels a lot more sinister than it did twenty years ago. Even though it's a "General Audiences" movie, that's a great conversation starter about privacy and the price of fame.
🔗 Read more: Moana Disney on Ice: Why This Performance Is Actually Worth the Hype
Practical Steps for Parents and Fans
If you're thinking about introducing The Princess Diaries to your family, or just want to dive back into the Genovian lore, here is how to handle it:
- Acknowledge the Makeover Trope: Talk about how Mia was awesome even before Paolo got his hands on her. Remind younger viewers that glasses and curly hair are great.
- Compare to the Book: If you have a pre-teen, give them the book after they watch the movie. It’s a great way to show how "movie ratings" change the way stories are told. They’ll see a much more complex, albeit edgier, version of Mia.
- Check the Sequel: Remember that The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement is also rated G, but it moves even further away from the books. It’s basically fan-fiction at that point, but it maintains that same safe-for-everyone energy.
- Watch for the Cameos: Keep an eye out for Garry Marshall’s signature cameos and the appearance of his daughter and granddaughters. It’s a real family affair, which explains why the rating stayed so wholesome.
The reality of The Princess Diaries movie rating is that it represents a disappearing genre: the high-quality, live-action family film that doesn't feel like it's talking down to kids or boring the adults. It’s a "G" that earned its stripes through genuine charm rather than just being "for babies." Whether you're in it for the nostalgia or the crown, it remains one of the safest, most heart-warming bets in the Disney catalog.
To get the most out of your viewing, try watching the film alongside the director's commentary if you can find it on physical media or certain streaming "extras" sections. Hearing Garry Marshall talk about his "family-first" approach to filmmaking really puts that G rating into perspective. It wasn't an accident; it was a choice made by a director who knew exactly how to make a classic.