You probably think of Matthew Broderick and immediately picture him skipping school in a Ferrari or leading a marching band through downtown Chicago. It’s the classic 80s vibe. But then there’s the Project X movie 1987. If you haven't seen it in a while, or if you only know the 2012 party film of the same name, you’re in for a massive tonal shock.
It starts like a fun, lighthearted animal flick.
Then it breaks your heart.
🔗 Read more: Hey Diddle Diddle: Why the Cow Jumped Over the Moon and What It Actually Means
Honestly, it’s one of the weirdest bait-and-switches in Hollywood history. 20th Century Fox marketed it as a breezy comedy-drama about a pilot and a smart chimpanzee. The posters showed Broderick smiling. The trailers had upbeat music. But the actual plot? It’s a high-stakes Cold War thriller about nuclear radiation, animal cruelty, and the ethical bankruptcy of the military-industrial complex.
What the Project X Movie 1987 Was Actually About
Jimmy Garrett (Broderick) is a pilot in the Air Force who gets grounded after a bit of a reckless stunt. To pay his dues, he’s sent to a top-secret research facility. He thinks he’s just babysitting chimps. One of those chimps is Virgil. Virgil is special. He was taught American Sign Language (ASL) by a researcher named Teri Macdonald, played by Helen Hunt.
The bond between Jimmy and Virgil is the soul of the movie. It’s cute. Virgil signs for "apple." He plays games. But the "Project X" part of the title refers to a flight simulator designed to see how long a pilot can operate a plane after being hit with a lethal dose of radiation.
They weren't using humans for the final stage.
The military was using the chimps. They’d blast them with radiation in the simulator to see when their motor skills failed. It’s grim. Basically, once a chimp reached a certain level of proficiency in the "cockpit," they were sent to the "chamber" to die for data. When Jimmy realizes that his new friend Virgil is next on the list for a lethal dose, the movie shifts from a workplace drama into a full-blown escape thriller.
The Reality of Military Animal Testing in the 80s
This wasn't just some sci-fi fever dream. The Project X movie 1987 was actually tapping into a very real, very controversial part of American history. During the Cold War, the U.S. military really did use primates to simulate the effects of nuclear warfare.
The "Project X" in the film is widely believed to be inspired by the real-life research conducted at places like Brooks Air Force Base. Researchers there used the "Primate Equilibrium Platform." It was a flight simulator for monkeys. They would expose the animals to radiation or chemicals and then measure how well they could keep the platform level.
Writer Lawrence Lasker—who also co-wrote WarGames, which explains the techno-thriller DNA here—didn't just pull this out of thin air. He was interested in the intersection of technology and morality. The movie forced audiences to look at the "dirty work" of national security.
✨ Don't miss: Why Mora Lo Mismo de Siempre is the Reality Check Reggaeton Needed
It’s easy to forget how much the 80s were obsessed with nuclear annihilation. Between The Day After and Threads, everyone was terrified. This movie just took that fear and applied it to the creatures who had no choice in the matter.
Why the Tone Feels So Strange Now
Watching it today, the pacing is wild. You’ve got these long, silent sequences of Virgil signing. It feels like a documentary. Then, suddenly, there’s an action set piece with a fire extinguisher and a daring escape.
Director Jonathan Kaplan had a background in "exploitation" cinema (he did White Line Fever), and you can see that grit peaking through the polished Hollywood exterior. He doesn’t shy away from the physical distress of the animals. When the chimps start getting sick from the radiation, the camera lingers. It’s uncomfortable. It’s meant to be.
Broderick is perfectly cast because he has that "I’m just a nice guy" energy that makes his eventual rebellion feel earned. He isn't a hero at the start. He’s just a guy following orders until those orders become impossible to live with. Helen Hunt’s character provides the emotional bridge, showing the audience that Virgil isn't just a "test subject"—he’s a person with a different vocabulary.
The Production Controversy You Didn't Hear About
You’d think a movie about saving chimps would be a darling for animal rights groups. Not exactly. During the production of the Project X movie 1987, rumors swirled about how the animal actors were being treated on set.
💡 You might also like: Boyd Crowder on Justified: Why We Can’t Stop Watching the Silver-Tongued Devil
Bob Barker, the legendary Price is Right host and vocal animal advocate, actually led a bit of a crusade against the film. There were allegations that the chimps were being "disciplined" with sticks or prods to get the performances needed for the more intense scenes.
The producers denied it, of course. They claimed they used positive reinforcement and that the "sticks" were just for guiding. But the irony wasn't lost on anyone: a movie protesting the mistreatment of chimps was being accused of mistreating chimps. This led to a bit of a PR nightmare that arguably hurt its box office performance. It’s a complex legacy. It makes the movie even harder to watch if you’re a sensitive viewer, adding a layer of meta-uncomfortability to the whole experience.
Is It Still Worth Watching?
Yeah. Honestly, it is.
Even with the behind-the-scenes baggage, the film stands as a unique artifact of a time when big studios would take a massive budget and use it to make people feel guilty about government policy. We don't get a lot of "Nuclear Ethics" movies starring A-list heartthrobs anymore.
The ending—without spoiling the specifics for the three people who haven't seen it—is surprisingly soaring. It leans into a sort of "nature finds a way" theme that predates Jurassic Park but with a much more grounded, melancholy feel. It’s about the loss of innocence. Jimmy loses his career. Virgil loses his home. But they both gain their humanity, in a weird way.
The animatronics and puppet work used for some of the more dangerous shots (supervised by Rick Baker's team, though often uncredited in the main highlight reels) still hold up. When the chimps scream in the simulator, it feels visceral. You can't fake that kind of tension with modern CGI. It feels heavy.
Actionable Takeaways for Movie Buffs
If you’re planning on revisiting this 80s staple or watching it for the first time, keep a few things in mind to get the most out of it:
- Look for the ASL nuances: The filmmakers actually used real American Sign Language. Virgil’s signs aren't just random hand waving; they are contextually correct for the most part, which was a huge step for representation at the time.
- Compare it to WarGames: Since Lawrence Lasker worked on both, look for the similarities in how he portrays military officers. They aren't "evil" villains; they are bureaucrats who have become detached from the human (or animal) cost of their data.
- Contextualize the 1987 landscape: This came out the same year as Fatal Attraction and Three Men and a Baby. It was a weird time for cinema. Project X was the "serious" movie that parents took their kids to by mistake, leading to a generation of traumatized Gen Xers.
- Research the "Washoe" connection: The character of Virgil is loosely inspired by real-life chimps like Washoe or Nim Chimpsky who were taught sign language in the 60s and 70s. Reading up on the "Project Nim" story makes the movie feel much more like a tragedy than a thriller.
The Project X movie 1987 remains a polarizing, strange, and deeply moving piece of film. It’s a reminder that sometimes the most effective way to talk about human rights is to look through the eyes of a chimp named Virgil who just wants an apple and a friend.
To truly understand the impact of the film, watch the 2011 documentary Project Nim afterward. It provides the harrowing real-world context of what happened to "signing chimps" once their research funding ran out. Comparing the Hollywood ending of 1987 to the reality of the 1970s research programs offers a sobering look at how we use fiction to process our collective guilt. Following this, look into the current status of the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act to see how legislation regarding primate testing has evolved since the movie's release.