Why the Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire Routine Is Still the Gold Standard for Dance

Why the Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire Routine Is Still the Gold Standard for Dance

Fred Astaire didn't just dance. He defied physics while wearing a top hat. If you’ve ever fallen down a YouTube rabbit hole of old movie clips, you’ve probably seen it—the cane, the tailcoat, and that rhythmic, almost aggressive tapping. The Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire performance from the 1946 film Blue Skies is often cited by historians and dancers as the single most complex piece of choreography ever captured on film.

It’s iconic. It’s also a total nightmare of technical precision.

Most people think of Fred Astaire as this breezy, effortless guy who just glided across floors. Honestly? That’s exactly what he wanted you to think. But the reality behind the scenes of the "Puttin’ on the Ritz" number was one of obsessive perfectionism and a level of rhythmic complexity that makes modern pop choreography look like a middle school recital.

The Song’s Strange History

Before we talk about the feet, we have to talk about the song. Irving Berlin wrote "Puttin' on the Ritz" in 1927. Originally, it was about the flashily dressed Black residents of Harlem parading up and down Lenox Avenue. By the time Astaire got his hands on it for the 1946 movie Blue Skies, Berlin had actually updated the lyrics to reflect a more general "high society" vibe.

The rhythm of the song is weird. It’s syncopated in a way that’s counter-intuitive. Berlin used a 4/4 time signature but layered the melody in a way that feels like it’s constantly trying to trip the singer up. Astaire loved that. He thrived on the "off-beat."

Why the 1946 Version is the One That Matters

Astaire had performed the song before, but the Blue Skies version is the one that changed everything. He was technically "retired" at the time—or at least he said he was. He came back to do this film as a favor to Bing Crosby, and he decided he needed a "solo" that would leave a permanent mark.

He spent five weeks just rehearsing this one number. Five weeks. For a few minutes of screen time.

The sequence involves Astaire dancing with multiple "clones" of himself. Back in 1946, they didn't have digital compositing or green screens. They had to use a process called "optical printing." Astaire had to film his lead performance, then go back and film the background "clones" while perfectly matching his original timing. If he was off by a fraction of a second, the illusion would break.

It’s mind-boggling.

Think about the sheer muscle memory required to hit the exact same tap sounds at the exact same millisecond across multiple takes. Most dancers today struggle to match their own live performance to a pre-recorded track; Astaire was matching his entire body's geometry to a ghost of himself.

The Breakdown of the "Impossible" Rhythm

There is a specific moment in the Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire routine that musicians and dancers still analyze today. It’s the "counter-rhythm" section. While the music is playing in a steady beat, Astaire’s feet start playing a different rhythm entirely.

He’s basically performing a drum solo with his shoes.

✨ Don't miss: How to Actually Get on HGTV: What Most People Get Wrong About Casting

He isn't just following the melody. He’s fighting it. He’s hitting accents on the "ands" and the "uhs" of the beats. If you watch his upper body, it’s completely still—the classic "Astaire line"—while his legs are doing something that seems mathematically improbable. He used a cane not just as a prop, but as a percussion instrument.

"Fred Astaire's contribution to dance is immeasurable. He was the first to insist that the camera stay wide and show the whole body, but in 'Ritz,' he proved the camera could also be a partner in the rhythm." — Dance historian Arlene Croce (paraphrased from her extensive analysis of Astaire's technique).

Myths and Misconceptions

A lot of people think the sounds you hear in the movie are the actual sounds recorded on the set. Nope. Not even close.

Astaire was notorious for "dubbing" his own taps. He would watch the finished film and then, in a recording studio, he would wear his tap shoes and "perform" the audio for the dance. He wanted the taps to sound crisp, like a snare drum. If a single click sounded "muddy" because of the floor's acoustics on the soundstage, he’d redo the whole thing.

Another common myth is that Astaire hated the choreography. In reality, he was his own harshest critic. He reportedly thought the "clones" were a bit of a gimmick at first, but once he saw the finished edit, he realized it emphasized the precision of his movement. If nine Fred Astaires are on screen and one of them is an inch out of place, you’d notice. They weren't.

The Cane and the Tailcoat: More Than Fashion

You can't talk about Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire without mentioning the wardrobe. The tailcoat isn't just for show. It’s weighted.

Astaire had his tailcoats specifically tailored so that when he spun, the tails would flare out at a specific angle and then return to his sides immediately. He didn't want them flapping around like wet rags. He even had weights sewn into the hems to control the centrifugal force.

👉 See also: Why The Day of the Doctor Full Episode Still Matters Over a Decade Later

The cane was also custom. It had to be the right weight to flip and spin without being so light that it looked like a toy. In the "Ritz" number, the cane becomes an extension of his arm. When he slams it against the floor, it’s a deliberate musical note.

Why It Still Works in the TikTok Era

We live in an age of "jump cut" editing. If a dancer messes up, the editor just cuts to a different angle.

Astaire refused to do that. He insisted that the camera show his entire body from head to toe for the duration of the dance. No "cheating" with close-ups of feet or reaction shots of the audience. This transparency is why the Puttin’ on the Ritz Astaire routine still feels so impressive. You are seeing a human being do something extraordinary in real-time.

When you watch a modern dance video, you’re often seeing the work of the editor as much as the dancer. With Astaire, you’re seeing the work of the athlete.

Key Lessons from the Routine

If you're a performer, a creator, or just someone who appreciates the "best of the best," there are three huge takeaways from this performance:

  1. Precision Beats Speed: Astaire isn't the fastest tapper in history (that might be Savion Glover or Eleanor Powell), but his precision is unmatched. Every sound is intentional.
  2. The "Cool" Factor is Effortless: The reason he looks so cool is that he hides the work. He’s sweating through his suit, but his face looks like he’s just taking a stroll.
  3. Use the Whole Space: He doesn't just stay in the center. He uses the levels, the props, and the shadows.

What to Look for Next Time You Watch

Keep an eye on his hands. Most dancers get "claws" when they focus hard. Astaire’s hands are always relaxed, his thumbs tucked in slightly—a trick he used to keep his hands from looking too large on camera.

Also, listen for the silence. There are moments where the music drops out and it’s just the raw sound of wood on wood. That’s where the real magic is.


Practical Steps to Appreciate the Craft

  • Watch the "Blue Skies" (1946) version first. Don't confuse it with the 1930 film or the later covers. This is the definitive technical performance.
  • Compare it to the Clark Gable version. For a laugh, look up Clark Gable's "Puttin' on the Ritz" in Idol's Delight. It’s charming, but it shows you just how much skill Astaire actually had by comparison.
  • Listen to the original Irving Berlin sheet music. If you can read music, look at the syncopation in the "Ritz" score. It helps you understand why Astaire’s timing was so revolutionary.
  • Check out the "slow-mo" breakdowns on YouTube. There are several dance channels that have slowed the "Ritz" footage down to 0.5x speed. Only then can you truly see the "between-the-beat" taps that are invisible at full speed.