People usually think the debate over the reason for God is a dusty relics-of-the-past kind of conversation. You know the vibe—old men in robes arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. But honestly? It’s probably the most practical question you’ll ever ask yourself. It’s not just about whether a guy with a white beard is sitting on a cloud. It’s about why the universe isn't just a chaotic, silent void and why you feel like your life actually means something more than just chemical reactions in a meat suit.
The world is loud. We have TikTok, 24-hour news cycles, and the constant hum of "productivity." Yet, when the lights go out, that nagging "why" remains.
Timothy Keller, the late pastor and author who famously wrote The Reason for God, didn't just pull his arguments out of thin air. He spent decades in Manhattan—possibly the most skeptical place on Earth—talking to CEOs, artists, and doubters. He realized that everyone has "blind faith" in something, whether they call it religion or not. If you believe there is no God, you’re making a huge leap of faith based on the evidence you see, just like a believer does. It’s a level playing field.
The Fine-Tuning Problem
The universe is weirdly specific. If the strong nuclear force—the stuff that holds atoms together—was off by even a fraction of a percentage, we wouldn’t have stars. Or planets. Or you.
Scientists call this "fine-tuning." Sir Fred Hoyle, a famous astronomer who was actually an atheist for a long time, once said that a "common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics." He wasn't trying to be a preacher. He was just looking at the math. The math is scary precise. Imagine a control panel with 50 dials, and every single one has to be set to exactly the right millimeter for life to exist. If you stumbled upon a panel like that in the woods, you wouldn’t think, "Oh, a windstorm did that." You’d think someone built it.
This is a core pillar in the reason for God discussion. It’s the "Cosmological Argument" but without the boring textbook feel. Basically: stuff exists, and it didn't have to. Why does it?
💡 You might also like: Why Soft and Comfortable Shoes are Actually Hard to Find (and What to Buy Instead)
Logic tells us that everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist (thanks, Big Bang theory). Therefore, the universe has a cause. It's a simple syllogism, but it’s a headache for anyone trying to prove that everything came from literally nothing. People like William Lane Craig have spent their whole lives defending this "Kalam" argument, and while skeptics like Lawrence Krauss argue that "nothing" is actually a boiling sea of quantum fluctuations, that still leaves you wondering where the fluctuations came from.
The Clues of Moral Instinct
Have you ever seen something truly unfair and felt a physical punch in the gut? Maybe it’s a news story about a child being hurt or a massive corporate scam.
If we are just biological accidents, "evil" doesn't really exist. It’s just an evolutionary disadvantage or a social construct. But nobody actually lives like that. We live as if justice is a real thing, like gravity. C.S. Lewis, the guy who wrote Narnia but was also a brilliant Oxford academic, focused heavily on this. He argued that if there is no "standard" outside of us, we can’t call a line crooked. You need a straight edge to know what a mess looks like.
The reason for God often finds its strongest evidence in our outrage. If you’re mad at the world for being "wrong," you’re admitting there’s a way it ought to be. Where did that "ought" come from? If we’re just survival-of-the-fittest machines, why do we care about the weak? Evolutionarily speaking, we should probably ignore them. But we don't. We build hospitals. We cry at funerals.
Skepticism is a Two-Edged Sword
We live in an age of doubt. It’s the default setting. But here’s the kicker: you have to doubt your doubts.
When someone says, "You can't know the truth about God because all religions are just cultural products," they are making a truth claim. They are saying they know the "truth" that no one else can know the truth. It’s a bit of a loop. Keller often pointed out that skepticism isn't a neutral vacuum. It’s its own belief system.
If you say, "I only believe what can be proven by science," you can't actually prove that statement with science. There’s no laboratory experiment that proves "only science gives us truth." It’s a philosophical leap. Acknowledging this changes the whole reason for God conversation. It stops being "Science vs. Religion" and starts being "Which story of the world makes the most sense of the data?"
The "God-Shaped Hole" is More Than a Cliche
Blaise Pascal, the 17th-century math genius, talked about this infinite abyss inside humans that only an infinite object (God) could fill.
📖 Related: 50 Yards to Feet: The Math Most People Get Wrong
It sounds cheesy until you look at celebrities who have everything—money, fame, looks—and are still miserable. If we were just evolved animals, food and sex should be enough. A dog doesn't have an existential crisis because it hasn't found its "purpose." It just wants a biscuit. Humans are the only creatures that seem to have a hunger that the physical world can't satisfy.
Maybe that’s because we aren't just physical.
Alvin Plantinga, a heavy-hitter in modern philosophy, argues that our cognitive faculties are designed to track truth. But if our brains are just wired for survival, we don't need "truth," we just need "not getting eaten by a tiger." If naturalism is true, our thoughts are just neuro-chemical events. Why should we trust them to tell us anything about the "reason" for anything?
What This Means for Your Tuesday Afternoon
This isn't just about winning an argument at a dinner party. It changes how you treat your neighbor. If the reason for God is solid, then every human you see has infinite, intrinsic value. They aren't just a cog in the economy or a voter in a demographic. They are an image-bearer.
It also changes how you handle suffering. If there's no God, suffering is just bad luck. It sucks, and then you die. But if there is a reason, then even the darkest moments might be "profoundly meaningful," as Viktor Frankl suggested in Man’s Search for Meaning. Frankl survived the Holocaust and realized that those who believed their lives had a purpose outside themselves were the ones who could endure the unendurable.
📖 Related: Why the Black Jordan 11 Retro Still Dominates Sneaker Culture
Practical Steps to Explore the Reason for God
- Audit your "unprovable" beliefs. Sit down for ten minutes. Ask yourself: "What do I believe about human rights or morality that I can't actually prove with a microscope?" You’ll find a lot.
- Read the "Other" Side. If you're a believer, read Christopher Hitchens’ God Is Not Great. It’s sharp and angry and makes good points about religious corruption. If you're a skeptic, read Keller’s The Reason for God or Francis Collins’ The Language of God. Collins led the Human Genome Project and is a world-class scientist who found the evidence for a creator compelling.
- Look at the "Clues." Spend a night away from city lights looking at the stars, or sit with the complexity of a DNA strand. Don't try to "decide" anything. Just observe the sheer scale of the information present in the universe.
- Test the "Meaning" Theory. For one week, try living as if every person you meet is of infinite worth. See if that feels more "true" to the human experience than treating them as mere biological accidents.
The search for the reason for God isn't about finding a magic formula that answers every question. It's about finding the narrative that best fits the world we actually live in—a world of beauty, math, justice, and an unshakable feeling that we are not alone.