Honestly, if you look at the history of the Midway, it’s always been about the ground game. Think about it. The franchise is practically built on the backs of guys like Red Grange, Gale Sayers, and Walter Payton. But lately? The running backs for Chicago Bears fans have become a source of constant debate, mostly because the team keeps swapping identities like they’re trying on new shoes. It's frustrating. One week we’re looking at a power-heavy scheme, and the next, it’s all about lateral speed and dump-off passes.
The current backfield isn't just one guy. It’s a committee. D’Andre Swift was the big splash in free agency, bringing that explosive, "home run" threat that Ryan Poles clearly craved. Then you’ve got Roschon Johnson, who basically runs like he’s trying to break through a brick wall, and Khalil Herbert, whose vision is top-tier even if his pass protection has been a bit of a question mark over the years. It’s a mix that sounds good on paper, but the reality on the grass at Soldier Field is often a lot messier than the stats suggest.
The Swift Factor and the Price of Speed
When the Bears handed D’Andre Swift a three-year, $24 million deal, people talked. A lot. Some folks thought it was an overpay for a position that the rest of the NFL is devaluing faster than last year’s iPhone. But Swift offers something the Bears haven't had in a while: genuine 4.4 speed that can turn a simple check-down into a 60-yard nightmare for a safety. He’s elusive. He’s twitchy. He makes people miss in space.
However, there’s a catch. Swift has historically thrived behind elite offensive lines, like the one he had in Philadelphia. Chicago’s line? It's improving, sure, but it’s not the Eagles' front. You can’t just expect a guy to dance in the backfield and find a hole if the interior pressure is immediate. Swift needs lanes. If he doesn't get them, those 15-yard gains turn into 2-yard losses real fast.
Why Roschon Johnson is the Secret Sauce
If you’re a fan of old-school, "three yards and a cloud of dust" football, Roschon is your guy. He’s massive. He’s a former quarterback from Texas who understands leverage better than most veterans. What’s wild is that he doesn't get the same headlines as Swift, but he might be the most "Chicago" back on the roster.
Let's talk about pass blocking. It’s the boring stuff that fans ignore until the quarterback gets leveled. Roschon is elite here. He relishes hitting blitzing linebackers. In a league where keeping your young franchise QB healthy is the only thing that matters, having a running back who can stone-wall a defensive end is worth more than a few flashy touchdowns. He’s the guy you want in the game during the fourth quarter when you’re nursing a four-point lead and just need to keep the clock moving.
The Khalil Herbert Dilemma
Khalil Herbert is a fascinating case study in NFL value. Purely as a runner? The man is a technician. He has some of the best "yards after contact" metrics in the league over the last few seasons. He sees the cutback lane before it even opens.
But football is a three-down game. If you can’t catch reliably or if you’re a liability in the blitz pickup, coaches get nervous. It’s why we’ve seen Herbert’s snap counts fluctuate so wildly. It’s not that he isn’t talented; it’s that he’s a specialist in an era that demands Swiss Army knives. Whenever the running backs for Chicago Bears talk comes up, Herbert is the name that usually surfaces in trade rumors, mostly because he’s too good to be a third-stringer but maybe doesn't fit the "every-down" mold the current coaching staff wants.
Scheme Over Stars?
The offensive philosophy under Shane Waldron has shifted things. It’s a system rooted in the McVay/Shanahan tree, which means heavy use of "outside zone" and "duo" concepts. This requires backs to be decisive. You can't stutter-step. You see the gap, you plant the foot, and you go.
- Swift fits the outside zone because of his lateral agility.
- Johnson fits the power/gap plays where he can just lower his shoulder.
- Herbert is the versatile middle ground.
The problem? Consistency. The Bears have struggled to find a rhythm where these three styles complement each other rather than clashing. Sometimes it feels like they’re trying to force a rotation just for the sake of it, rather than riding the hot hand. Fans hate that. We’ve all seen a guy get 40 yards on a drive only to be benched for the next two series. It's maddening.
The Ghost of Walter Payton
You can’t talk about the backfield in Chicago without acknowledging the shadow of Number 34. Every new back who walks into Halas Hall is measured against a guy who isn't just a legend—he's a deity. This creates a weird pressure. Chicago fans don’t just want production; they want toughness. They want a guy who will finish a run by initiating contact.
🔗 Read more: Atlanta Braves Schedule for July: Why This Summer Could Be Brutal
That’s why someone like Swift gets a shorter leash from the local media if he bounces a run outside and loses yardage. The "Chicago Way" is to put your head down and get the tough yards. It might be an outdated mindset in the modern, high-flying NFL, but it’s the reality of the market. If you’re going to be one of the running backs for Chicago Bears history books, you have to be willing to get your jersey dirty.
Moving Beyond the "Workhorse" Myth
The "Bell Cow" running back is dead. Mostly. Unless you’re Christian McCaffrey or Derrick Henry, you’re part of a committee. The Bears are leaning into this hard. The total rushing yards for the team often look respectable at the end of the year, but it’s spread across four different players, including the quarterback.
Actually, the quarterback’s mobility changes everything for the backs. When the defense has to account for a QB who can tuck it and run for 20 yards, it thins out the box. This should make life easier for Swift and company. But it also means the backs have to be more disciplined. They have to stay in their lanes and be ready for the ball at any second.
What Most People Get Wrong About This Backfield
A common misconception is that the Bears lack talent at the position. That’s just not true. They actually have one of the deeper rooms in the NFC. The issue is identity. Are they a speed-based offense? A power-based one?
When the offensive line is healthy and clicking, the run game looks elite. When the guards are getting pushed back, the backs look hesitant. It’s a symbiotic relationship that often gets blamed entirely on the guy carrying the ball. If you want to understand why the running backs for Chicago Bears struggle at times, look at the "Stunts" and "Twists" the opposing defensive lines are using. Chicago has historically struggled with picking those up, which kills a run play before it even starts.
Actionable Steps for the Season Ahead
If you’re following the team or managing a fantasy roster, here is how to actually look at this backfield without losing your mind:
- Watch the First Quarter Snap Count: The Bears usually telegraph their "lead" back for the day in the first two drives. If Swift gets the bulk of the early work, they’re trying to tire the defense out with speed.
- Monitor the Red Zone Personnel: Roschon Johnson is the high-value guy here. If the Bears are inside the five-yard line, he’s the one most likely to get the "garbage" touchdowns that win games.
- Check the Injury Report for the Guards: The success of the Bears' inside zone runs depends almost entirely on the health of the interior offensive line. If the starting center is out, expect the run game to move to the edges.
- Ignore the "Starter" Label: In Chicago, the "starter" is just the guy who takes the first snap. The guy who finishes the game is usually the one who had the best pass-blocking reps in the first half.
The reality of being a running back in Chicago is that you're always one bad fumble away from the bench, but one highlight-reel hurdle away from being a city hero. It's a high-stakes, high-pressure environment that requires a specific kind of mental toughness. As the season progresses, the rotation will likely tighten, but for now, it’s a fascinating, messy, and high-potential group that defines the modern NFL backfield.