Art usually tries to make things look better than they are. Even when it’s depicting a battle, there’s usually some general on a white horse looking heroic while a flag waves perfectly in the breeze. But then you look at The Third of May 1808 by Francisco Goya, and everything feels wrong. It’s messy. It’s loud. You can almost smell the gunpowder and the metallic tang of blood hitting the pavement.
Goya didn't paint this to celebrate a victory. He painted it because he was angry, and frankly, maybe a little bit guilty. It’s a massive canvas sitting in the Prado Museum in Madrid, and even if you aren’t an "art person," it hits you like a physical punch to the gut. It changed everything about how we look at war.
What actually happened on that hill in Madrid?
To understand the painting, you have to look at the mess that was Spain in the early 1800s. Basically, Napoleon Bonaparte was sweeping across Europe, and he convinced the Spanish royals he just wanted to "pass through" to get to Portugal. It was a lie. Napoleon moved in, kicked the Spanish King off the throne, and put his brother Joseph in charge.
The people of Madrid weren't having it. On May 2, 1808, they rose up in the streets with pocketknives and paving stones. The French responded with brutal, systematic efficiency. On the following day—the titular May 3rd—the French soldiers rounded up anyone they suspected of participating in the riot and marched them to various locations, including the Príncipe Pío hill.
Then they shot them.
🔗 Read more: Anna Samson Movies and TV Shows: Why Everyone is Suddenly Talking About the Return to Paradise Star
The guy in the white shirt
When you look at The Third of May 1808, your eyes go straight to the man in the center. He’s wearing a bright white shirt, and he’s kneeling with his arms thrown wide. Honestly, he looks like a human target. He is a human target.
Goya isn't being subtle here. The man’s pose is a direct reference to the crucifixion of Christ. If you look really closely at his right hand, you can see a small mark that looks like a stigmata. He isn't a soldier; he's a martyr. But unlike traditional religious art, there’s no angel coming down to save him. There’s just a firing squad.
The soldiers are terrifying because you can't see their faces. They are a wall of gray and brown uniforms, hunched over their muskets like a machine. They aren't individuals; they are the "state." They are the cold, hard logic of an empire that doesn't care about the guy in the white shirt or the monk praying beside him.
Why Goya broke the "rules" of art
Before this painting, war art was about glory. Think of Jacques-Louis David’s paintings of Napoleon—all clean lines, noble faces, and epic lighting. Goya threw all of that in the trash.
📖 Related: Why You Made a Way Lyrics by Travis Greene Still Hit So Different Years Later
He used thick, "muddy" paint. The ground is literally a dark, bloody slush. There is no perspective that makes sense or feels "beautiful." The lantern on the ground is the only light source, and it casts a harsh, artificial glare that makes the scene feel like a stage play gone horribly wrong.
Art historian Robert Hughes once noted that this was the first truly "modern" painting of war. It treats death as something ugly and final, not something noble. There is no afterlife suggested here. There is only the dirt, the blood, and the next group of people waiting in line to be executed. You can see them stretching back into the darkness, a never-ending queue of the condemned.
The political drama behind the canvas
Here’s a bit of gossip that often gets left out of the textbooks: Goya actually worked for the French-backed government for a while. He was the court painter. He saw which way the wind was blowing and he kept his job.
It wasn't until 1814, after the French were finally kicked out and the Spanish monarchy was restored, that Goya proposed this painting (and its companion, The Second of May 1808). Some people think he did it to prove his loyalty to the new King, Ferdinand VII. He needed to show he was a "true Spaniard" after years of working for the occupiers.
Whatever his motivation, the result was a masterpiece of propaganda that transcended its own politics. It stopped being about a specific fight between Spain and France and became about the concept of the "little guy" versus the "machine."
The legacy you see in every modern war movie
You can track the DNA of The Third of May 1808 through the last two centuries of culture. Picasso’s Guernica? It wouldn't exist without Goya. Manet’s Execution of Emperor Maximilian? It’s basically a cover version of this painting.
✨ Don't miss: Why Bugsy Malone the movie is still a total fever dream fifty years later
Even modern cinema uses Goya’s "visual language." When a director focuses on the terrified face of a civilian instead of the grand strategy of a general, they are using Goya’s playbook. He invented the "war is hell" aesthetic long before cameras were around to capture it.
The painting is also surprisingly big. It’s nearly 9 feet tall and 11 feet wide. When you stand in front of it in the Prado, the figures are almost life-sized. You feel like if you took two steps forward, you’d be standing in the line, waiting for the muskets to fire. It’s an immersive experience that no smartphone screen can really replicate.
Common misconceptions about the work
- It wasn't painted at the time. People think Goya was standing there with a sketchbook while the bullets flew. He wasn't. He painted it six years after the fact.
- It wasn't an immediate hit. Believe it or not, the painting sat in storage for decades. The Spanish monarchy wasn't actually that fond of it; it was too raw, too grim.
- The "Príncipe Pío" location. While the painting is iconic, the executions happened all over Madrid. Goya chose this specific spot because it allowed for that dramatic view of the city in the background, making the violence feel like it was happening right on the doorstep of "civilization."
How to appreciate it if you ever visit Madrid
If you find yourself in the Prado, don't just snap a photo and walk away. Stand back first to see the scale of the firing squad. Then, move closer—specifically to the bottom left.
Look at the bodies. Goya didn't paint them as "heroic fallen." They are heaps of clothes and flesh. One man has his face buried in the dirt. Another’s brains are literally spilling onto the ground. It’s incredibly graphic for 1814. Goya wanted you to be disgusted. He wanted you to feel the weight of the loss.
Also, look at the city of Madrid in the background. It’s dark and silent. It’s a reminder that while this horror is happening, the rest of the world is sleeping or turning a blind eye. That’s the real tragedy Goya is pointing out.
Next Steps for Art Lovers
To truly grasp Goya's shift from a royal portraitist to a dark visionary, you should look up his "Black Paintings." These were murals he painted directly onto the walls of his house later in life when he was deaf and disillusioned. They make The Third of May look cheerful by comparison.
If you’re interested in the technical side, search for Goya's The Disasters of War etchings. They provide a much more detailed, almost journalistic look at the guerrilla warfare that inspired his larger oil paintings. Seeing the raw sketches helps you understand that the "messiness" of his style was a deliberate choice to mirror the messiness of human conflict.