Why Villette by Charlotte Bronte is Actually Better Than Jane Eyre

Why Villette by Charlotte Bronte is Actually Better Than Jane Eyre

Most people think Jane Eyre is the peak of Charlotte Brontë's career. It isn't. Not even close. If you want the raw, unpolished, and frankly terrifying reality of what it felt like to be a "surplus woman" in the 19th century, you have to read Villette by Charlotte Bronte. It’s a ghost story, a psychological thriller, and a romance all smashed into one messy, brilliant masterpiece.

I remember the first time I finished the last page. I was stunned. It doesn't give you the easy "Reader, I married him" satisfaction of Jane Eyre. It gives you something much more honest. Lucy Snowe, our narrator, is perhaps the most "unreliable" reliable narrator in English literature. She hides things from us. She’s cold. She’s observant. Honestly, she’s a bit of a creep, but that’s why we love her.

The Brussels Connection: Why This Story Feels So Real

This isn't just a random story Charlotte dreamt up. It’s basically a fictionalized trauma dump about her time in Brussels. In 1842, Charlotte and her sister Emily went to the Pensionnat Héger to study languages. Charlotte fell hard—and I mean painfully hard—for her teacher, Constantin Héger.

He was married. She was a plain, intense Englishwoman with a massive intellect and nowhere to put it.

When you read Villette by Charlotte Bronte, you're seeing the ghost of that obsession. The school in the book, located in the fictional city of Villette (which is just Brussels with a fake mustache), is a direct mirror of the Héger school. Every hallway, every cold classroom, and every judgmental look from the headmistress, Madame Beck, is rooted in Charlotte’s own sense of alienation.

💡 You might also like: Finding Names That Mean Small But Mighty for Your Little Powerhouse

She felt like an outsider. A Protestant in a Catholic country. A poor teacher among wealthy pupils.

Lucy Snowe: The Narrator Who Refuses to Be Known

Lucy Snowe is a weird one. You’ve got to give her credit for her sheer stubbornness. Unlike Jane Eyre, who tells us every single thought in her head, Lucy keeps secrets. She doesn't tell the reader that she recognizes a major character for several chapters. Why? Because she wants to see if we notice.

It’s a power move.

She’s a woman who has lost everything—her family, her money, her home. She has no "market value" in Victorian society. So, she retreats into her own mind. This is where the psychological depth of Villette by Charlotte Bronte really shines. Brontë explores the concept of "the buried life." Lucy is constantly suppressing her emotions, literally "burying" her desires under a cold, snowy exterior.

But then there’s the nun.

The Ghost of the Rue Fossette

Let’s talk about the nun. There’s this recurring "ghost" of a nun that haunts the attic and the garden of the school. In a lesser book, this would be a cheap Gothic trope. Here, it’s a manifestation of Lucy’s own repressed sexuality and her fear of being "cloistered" away forever.

Is the nun real? Is she a hallucination? Is she a prank?

The answer is actually quite grounded, but the way Charlotte writes the encounters—the sheer, heart-pounding dread—makes it feel more like a horror novel than a Victorian romance. It’s about the haunting of the self.

M. Paul Emanuel vs. The World

For most of the book, you think the love interest is going to be Dr. John. He’s handsome, kind, and English. He’s the "safe" choice. But Charlotte does something daring. She makes Dr. John boring.

Instead, she gives us M. Paul Emanuel.

He’s short. He’s temperamental. He’s a "fierce little man" who yells at Lucy and tries to control what she reads. By modern standards, he’s a walking red flag. But in the context of Villette by Charlotte Bronte, he’s the only person who actually sees Lucy. He recognizes her intellect. He doesn't want her to be a quiet little doll; he wants her to be his intellectual equal.

Their relationship is built on bickering, shared work, and mutual respect. It’s far more modern than the "master and servant" dynamic we often see in 19th-century fiction.

That Ending: The Ambiguity That Drives People Mad

We have to talk about the storm.

Charlotte’s father, Patrick Brontë, reportedly asked her to give the book a happy ending. Charlotte, being the stubborn genius she was, gave us a "choose your own adventure" finale instead. M. Paul goes away on a voyage for three years. Lucy thrives. She starts her own school. She becomes independent.

Then, the storm comes.

The description of the "destroying angel" of the tempest is some of the most beautiful, terrifying prose ever written. Charlotte leaves it up to you. Does he drown? Does he come home?

If you’re a romantic, you say he comes home. If you’ve been paying attention to the tone of the rest of the book, you know he’s at the bottom of the Atlantic.

Why Scholars Still Argue Over Villette

Virginia Woolf famously said that Villette by Charlotte Bronte was Brontë's finest novel. She argued that while Jane Eyre has the passion, Villette has the psychological truth. Modern critics like Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar (authors of The Madwoman in the Attic) view the book through a feminist lens, focusing on how Lucy Snowe navigates a world that wants to erase her.

There's also the religious tension.

Charlotte was a staunch Anglican, and the book is filled with a very specific, often uncomfortable anti-Catholic sentiment that was common in 1850s England. It’s a "limit of the text" that we have to acknowledge. It shows her biases, her fears of the "theatricality" of the Catholic Church, and her own struggle with loneliness.

Actionable Insights for Modern Readers

If you're planning to dive into this 500-plus page behemoth, don't treat it like a beach read. It’s dense. It’s slow. But the payoff is massive.

  1. Don't trust Lucy. She’s hiding her feelings from herself as much as from you. Watch for the gaps in her narrative.
  2. Pay attention to the French. A lot of the dialogue is in French. You don't need to be fluent, but having a translation app handy helps you catch M. Paul’s specific brand of snark.
  3. Research the "Surplus Woman" problem. Understanding the Victorian census of 1851, which showed a "surplus" of half a million women who would likely never marry, makes Lucy’s desperation and her drive for independence much more poignant.
  4. Compare it to Jane Eyre. Reading them back-to-back shows the evolution of a writer. Charlotte moved from the fairy-tale structure of Thornfield Hall to the gritty, psychological realism of the Rue Fossette.

The brilliance of the book lies in its refusal to be easy. It’s a story about a woman who survives not through beauty or luck, but through sheer, grinding willpower. That's why it remains relevant. We all have moments where we feel like Lucy Snowe—watching the world from the sidelines, waiting for our turn to speak, and wondering if the storm is going to take everything away or finally bring us home.

Go find a copy with the original French translations included in the footnotes. It makes the experience much smoother and allows the tension between Lucy and M. Paul to breathe without you constantly reaching for a dictionary. Sit with the ending. Let it be uncomfortable. That discomfort is exactly what Charlotte wanted you to feel.