Why What's the Funniest Joke Is Actually a Scientific Question

Why What's the Funniest Joke Is Actually a Scientific Question

Humor is weird. One person laughs at a guy slipping on a banana peel, while another needs a twelve-layer meta-ironic pun to even crack a smile. But when you search for what's the funniest joke, Google doesn't just give you a random "Why did the chicken cross the road?" entry. It usually points to a very specific, very famous study conducted by Dr. Richard Wiseman.

He's a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire. Back in 2001, he launched "LaughLab." It wasn't just a website; it was a massive digital experiment. They gathered over 40,000 jokes and had people from all over the world rate them. Honestly, the results were kind of shocking because the winner wasn't a sophisticated piece of satire. It was a story about two hunters.

The Hunter Joke: A Breakdown of the World Champion

If you've spent any time on Google Discover, you've probably seen a variation of this story pop up in a "Did you know?" style feed. It’s the one that consistently ranks for what's the funniest joke because it hits a specific psychological sweet spot. Here is the actual text of the joke that won the LaughLab study:

Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn't seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed. The other guy whips out his phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps, "My friend is dead! What can I do?" The operator says, "Calm down. I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead." There is a silence; then a shot is heard. Back on the phone, the guy says, "OK, now what?"

Why does this work? It’s not because it’s the most clever thing ever written. It works because of a concept called "incongruity resolution." You expect the hunter to check the pulse. Instead, he takes the operator’s instruction literally in the most violent way possible. It’s dark, it’s fast, and it has a clear punchline that transcends cultural barriers.

Dr. Wiseman noted that jokes featuring "superiority"—where we feel smarter than the subject—tend to perform well globally. We feel smart because we know what the operator meant, and we're laughing at the hunter's stupidity.


Why Google Discover Loves This Specific Topic

Google's algorithms are basically trying to predict what will make you click while you’re waiting for your coffee. What's the funniest joke is a high-engagement "evergreen" query. This means it doesn't go out of style. Unlike news about a specific movie release, people are always looking for a laugh.

The "Hunter Joke" is a staple of Google Discover because it’s backed by science. Google loves "E-E-A-T"—Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. A joke that was vetted by a university study carries more "authority" than a random Reddit thread. That’s why you see the LaughLab results cited by every major publication from the BBC to The Guardian.

It’s also about the "Goldilocks Effect." Some jokes are too short (no narrative tension). Some are too long (people lose interest). The Hunter Joke is just right. It’s a "snackable" piece of content.

The Competition: Norm Macdonald and the Moth Joke

If you ask a comedy nerd what's the funniest joke, they won't give you the LaughLab answer. They’ll tell you about Norm Macdonald. Specifically, the "Moth Joke."

Norm told this joke on The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien. It’s a sprawling, miserable story about a moth going to a podiatrist. The moth spends three minutes describing his failing marriage, his dying children, and his existential dread. Finally, the podiatrist asks, "Moth, why did you come here?" The moth says, "Because the light was on."

This is the polar opposite of the Google-friendly Hunter Joke. It’s an "anti-joke." It’s funny because it wastes your time. While it doesn't always rank #1 on Google for "funniest joke" (because it's too long for a featured snippet), it dominates the "cult favorite" search space.

Humor is subjective. Science tries to quantify it, but comedy writers like Jerry Seinfeld argue that the "funniest" thing is often just a specific sound or a perfectly timed pause.

✨ Don't miss: The King of the Hill DVD Set: Why Physical Media Still Beats Streaming for Arlen's Finest


The Weird Geography of Humor

One of the coolest things LaughLab discovered was that different countries have different "funny bones." If you're searching for what's the funniest joke in the UK, you're going to get different results than if you’re in the US or Germany.

  • USA and Canada: These audiences preferred jokes involving a sense of superiority or "dumb" characters.
  • United Kingdom: There’s a heavy lean toward wordplay, puns, and dry, observational wit.
  • Germany: Contrary to the stereotype that they don't have a sense of humor, Germans were actually among the most appreciative of jokes in the LaughLab study. They didn't have a specific "type"—they just liked a lot of different things.
  • France and Denmark: These regions showed a higher preference for surrealism.

There's a famous joke that ranks well in British circles involving a dog and a telegraph office. The dog wants to send a message that says "Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof. Woof." The clerk tells him for the same price he could add a tenth "Woof." The dog replies, "But then it wouldn't make any sense!"

That’s a very different vibe than the hunter shooting his friend. It’s absurd. It’s meta. It requires the listener to accept the premise that a dog understands the economy of telegrams but cares deeply about the internal logic of his message.

The Psychology of the "Aha!" Moment

When you laugh, your brain is releasing dopamine. It’s a reward for "solving" the joke. Think of a joke like a tiny puzzle. The setup provides the pieces, and the punchline is the moment they click together.

If the puzzle is too easy, it’s boring. If it’s too hard, it’s frustrating. What's the funniest joke is usually the one that provides the most satisfying "click."

The "Hunter Joke" provides a very loud click. You don't have to think about it for more than a millisecond. That speed is crucial for viral content and Google rankings. If a user has to read a joke three times to get it, they aren't going to share it.


The AI Problem in Modern Humor

Lately, if you ask an AI for what's the funniest joke, it usually fails miserably. It might give you a pun about a belt made of watches being a "waist of time." Why? Because AI doesn't understand "edge."

Comedy often lives in the "benign violation" zone. This is a theory proposed by Peter McGraw and Caleb Warren. For something to be funny, it has to be:

  1. A violation (something is wrong, threatening, or taboo).
  2. Benign (it’s actually safe).

The Hunter Joke is a violation because someone gets shot. It’s benign because it’s a fictional setup. AI is often programmed to avoid violations entirely, which makes its humor feel sanitized and "cringey." This is why human-written comedy still dominates Google Discover. We want that slight edge. We want the "inappropriate" thought that we aren't supposed to have.

Misconceptions About Search Rankings

A lot of people think the funniest joke is the one with the most "likes" on Reddit. Not necessarily. Google looks for "signals of quality." This includes how long people stay on a page (dwell time) and whether they click away quickly.

If a website has a list of 100 jokes, but the first 10 are terrible, the user leaves. This signals to Google that the page isn't actually "funny." The pages that consistently rank for what's the funniest joke are usually curated lists that lead with the Wiseman study or famous bits from legendary comedians like George Carlin or Richard Pryor.

Nuance matters. Context matters. Even the "best" joke fails if the delivery is wrong.


Actionable Insights for Better Humor

If you're trying to write a joke that could actually go viral or rank, stop trying to be "perfect." Humor is messy. Here is how to apply the "LaughLab" logic to your own storytelling or content creation:

Shorten the bridge. The distance between the setup and the punchline should be as short as possible. In the Hunter Joke, the "shot" happens in a single sentence. Don't over-explain.

Use specific imagery. Don't just say "a guy." Say "a hunter in the woods." It creates a mental movie. The more specific the image, the more grounded the "violation" feels.

Test for "Universal Incongruity." Does the joke rely on a very specific cultural reference? If so, it won't rank globally. The reason the what's the funniest joke search result is so consistent is that "death" and "misunderstanding a phone operator" are universal human experiences.

The "Rule of Three" is real but flexible. Many jokes use a pattern of three (two people fail, the third succeeds). But notice the Hunter Joke skips the "rule of three" for a "rule of two." It’s punchier.

Understand your platform. If you're writing for Google Discover, you need a hooky headline and a clear, fast payoff. If you're writing for a stand-up set, you can afford the "Norm Macdonald" slow burn.

Ultimately, the funniest joke isn't a fixed point in space. It's a moving target. But for now, the data says it’s two guys in the woods and a very confused 911 operator.

To improve your own comedic timing or content strategy, start by analyzing the jokes that "stop the scroll." Look at the word count. Look at where the "twist" happens. Usually, it's much earlier than you think. Avoid the "intro-heavy" style of AI-generated humor and get straight to the "violation." That is how you win the click and the laugh.