It starts small. Maybe it’s a snide comment on a social media thread that nobody calls out, or a slightly aggressive policy at work that everyone just shrugs off because "that's just how things are now." We like to think of evil as a sudden, cataclysmic explosion—a villain twirling a mustache while the world burns. But the reality is much quieter and, honestly, way more terrifying. When cruelty becomes normal, it doesn't arrive with a bang; it seeps in like a slow leak in the basement until you’re standing knee-deep in water and wondering why your socks are wet.
People are incredibly adaptable. It's one of our best traits, but also our most dangerous flaw. We can get used to almost anything. If you drop a frog in boiling water, it jumps out—or so the old (and factually questionable) proverb goes—but if you turn up the heat degree by degree, the frog just sits there. Humans are the same. We have this psychological safety valve called "habituation." It helps us ignore the hum of a refrigerator, but it also helps us ignore the suffering of the person sitting next to us if that suffering is constant enough.
✨ Don't miss: Summer Flower Arrangement: Why Yours Keep Wilting and How to Fix It
The Banality of the Everyday Mean
Hannah Arendt, a philosopher who watched the literal collapse of moral standards in the 20th century, coined the term "the banality of evil." She wasn't saying that evil is boring. She was saying that the most horrific acts in history weren't necessarily committed by sociopaths. Often, they were carried out by "terribly and terrifyingly normal" people who were just following the new rules of the day.
When cruelty becomes normal, it stops being a moral choice and starts being a bureaucratic one. You see this in corporate environments where "efficiency" is used as a shield to justify firing thousands of people via a generic email. You see it in the way we talk about unhoused populations, moving from empathy to viewing human beings as "urban blight" that needs to be "cleared."
It’s about the language we use. We stop saying "that person is hurting" and start saying "that's a data point." Or "that’s just the market." Or "they should have made better choices." Once you change the words, the cruelty follows.
The Psychology of Desensitization
Why does our brain let this happen? It’s basically a bandwidth issue. If you felt the full weight of every tragedy on the news every single morning, you’d never get out of bed. So, the brain dampens the signal.
Psychologists call this "compassion fatigue." It’s a very real thing. Doctors and nurses deal with it all the time. But when it spreads to the general public, the "baseline" for what is acceptable behavior shifts. Yesterday's outrage becomes today's "meh."
Think about the tone of online discourse. Fifteen years ago, if someone told a stranger to "die in a fire" over a movie opinion, it would have been shocking. Now? It’s just Tuesday. We’ve been conditioned to accept a level of vitriol that would have been unthinkable in a face-to-face conversation in 1995. This is how the "overton window" of behavior moves. What was once fringe and cruel becomes the center of the road.
The Infrastructure of Indifference
Societies don't just wake up cruel. They build an infrastructure for it. This is where the concept of "structural violence" comes in—a term often used by Dr. Paul Farmer, who spent his life looking at healthcare inequality.
🔗 Read more: Why the Rainbow Bar in Owosso is Still the Town’s Favorite Dive
When cruelty becomes normal, it gets baked into the systems.
- It’s the algorithm that prioritizes outrage because outrage generates clicks.
- It’s the "lean" business model that treats employees like interchangeable parts.
- It’s the legal loophole that allows a company to pollute a water source because the fine is cheaper than the fix.
These aren't individual acts of malice. They are systemic indifference. And indifference is just cruelty with a better PR department. Honestly, it's easier to fight an active hater than it is to fight someone who just doesn't care. The "just doing my job" defense is the ultimate hallmark of a society where cruelty has been normalized.
When the In-Group Shrinks
Another sign that we’re heading into dangerous territory is when our "circle of concern" starts to shrink. Evolutionarily, we are wired to care about our tribe. It’s a survival mechanism. But a healthy society works by expanding that tribe.
When things get tough—economically or socially—people tend to pull back. We start drawing lines. Us vs. Them. Patriots vs. Traitors. Workers vs. Elites. Once you put someone in the "Them" category, your brain literally processes their pain differently.
Functional MRI studies have shown that when we see someone from our own "group" in pain, the empathy centers of our brain light up. When we see someone we’ve been told is an "enemy" or "other" in pain? Those centers stay dark. In some cases, the reward centers actually flick on. That is the biological reality of when cruelty becomes normal: we stop feeling the sting of someone else's lash.
Breaking the Cycle of Normalization
So, how do you stop a slide into a culture of meanness? It isn’t by being "nice." Nice is passive. Kindness is active.
The first step is noticing the "micro-cruelties." It’s the way we talk about the person behind the counter, or the way we ghost someone because it’s easier than having a five-minute awkward conversation. These small things matter because they are the practice rounds for the big things.
The Power of the Positive Deviant
In sociology, there’s a concept called "positive deviance." It’s when someone in a group refuses to follow a negative norm, even when it’s inconvenient.
- Example: A whole office is gossiping about a coworker who is struggling. One person says, "Actually, I think they’re having a really hard time at home, maybe we should see if they need a hand."
- Result: The social pressure shifts. The "norm" of cruelty is broken by a single point of resistance.
You don't need a revolution to push back against normalized cruelty. You just need to refuse to use the language of dehumanization. Call things what they are. It’s not "collateral damage"; it’s dead people. It’s not "downsizing"; it’s families losing their livelihoods.
Moving Toward a New Baseline
We have to admit that we are all susceptible. Nobody is immune to the "bystander effect." We all want to fit in, and if the group is being cruel, it’s remarkably hard to be the one who stands up and says, "Hey, this is actually pretty messed up."
But the "norm" is a moving target. If it can move toward cruelty, it can move back toward decency. It just requires a conscious effort to stop the "slow leak."
Actionable Steps to Resist the Normalization of Cruelty
If you feel like the world is getting colder, you’re not imagining it. But you aren't powerless either. Here is how you can start recalibrating your own "normal" baseline:
- Audit Your Language. Stop using euphemisms for suffering. If a policy hurts people, say "this policy hurts people" instead of "this is a strategic realignment."
- Practice "Aggressive Empathy." When you find yourself judging someone—especially someone in a different social or political group—force yourself to imagine their morning. Imagine them brushing their teeth, worrying about their kids, or feeling lonely. It’s much harder to be cruel to a person than an abstraction.
- Interrupt the Momentum. When a conversation turns toward casual cruelty or "punching down," be the person who changes the subject or asks a clarifying question. You don't have to be a lecturer; just being a "speed bump" for the negativity can be enough to break the spell.
- Limit Outrage Consumption. The internet is designed to make you hate people you’ve never met. If you find yourself feeling a surge of "righteous" cruelty toward a stranger online, close the tab. That dopamine hit of being "right" is exactly how normalization happens.
- Support Human-Centric Systems. Whether it’s where you shop or where you work, look for places that prioritize human dignity over pure "optimization." It might cost a little more or take a little longer, but it’s a vote against the machinery of indifference.
The shift happens one interaction at a time. It's about deciding that just because everyone else is getting used to the heat, you're going to keep your hand on the thermostat. Don't let the "new normal" include the quiet acceptance of someone else's pain. Once you stop noticing the cruelty, it's already won. Be the person who still notices.