Tax policy usually has the charisma of a damp sponge. But when you start talking about the Harris capital gains tax proposals, things get heated fast. You've probably seen the headlines. Some claim it’s a total war on investors, while others say it’s just a moderate tweak to a system that’s been tilted for decades. Honestly? The reality is tucked somewhere in the middle, and it's a lot more specific than the 30-second soundbites suggest.
If you’re trying to figure out if your 401(k) or your house is about to get hit with a massive bill, take a breath. For about 99% of Americans, the answer is a hard no. But if you’re sitting on a pile of stocks and pulling in seven figures, the math is about to change significantly.
The 28% Pivot: Why It’s Not the Biden Plan
For a long time, the word on the street was that the administration wanted to tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income. That would have meant a top rate of 39.6%.
Kamala Harris broke away from that.
Basically, she’s pitched a 28% top rate for long-term capital gains. This applies specifically to people with a taxable income over $1 million. It’s a bit of a "middle path" move. It’s higher than the current 20% cap, sure, but it’s a far cry from the nearly 40% that some of the more progressive members of the party were pushing for.
Why the change? Harris herself said it's about rewarding "innovators, founders, and small businesses." She’s trying to thread a needle here—raising revenue from the top tier of earners without scaring off the venture capital that fuels Silicon Valley and the broader startup economy.
The "Hidden" Surcharge
Here is where it gets a little more expensive. You can't just look at the 28% in a vacuum. Most high earners also pay the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT).
Currently, that’s 3.8%. Under the broader proposal, that rate would likely climb to 5% for those making over $400,000.
- Old Top Rate: 20% + 3.8% = 23.8%
- Proposed Harris Rate: 28% + 5% = 33%
That 33% doesn't even include state taxes. If you’re in a place like California or New York, your total "all-in" tax on a stock sale could easily cruise past 40%. It’s a massive jump. It’s the kind of jump that makes people rethink when—and if—they sell their assets.
The "Unrealized Gains" Elephant in the Room
You’ve likely heard the term "unrealized gains" floating around. It sounds like financial jargon, but it’s actually a pretty wild concept in tax law.
Usually, you only pay taxes when you sell something. If you bought Bitcoin at $10 and it’s now worth $60,000, you don't owe Uncle Sam a dime until you trade it for cash. The billionaire minimum tax—which Harris has signaled support for—would change that for the ultra-wealthy.
Who actually gets hit?
This isn't for the person with a nice house and a healthy Vanguard account. This is strictly for households with a net worth over $100 million.
We are talking about roughly 10,000 people in the entire country.
The idea is to set a 25% minimum tax on total income, including those paper gains that haven't been cashed out yet. Critics, like the Tax Foundation, argue this is a nightmare to track. How do you value a private company every year? What happens if the stock price crashes the year after you paid the tax?
💡 You might also like: The Snowball Warren Buffett: Why This Massive Biography Is Still the Best Way to Understand Wealth
The proposal does include a "pre-payment" mechanism. If you pay tax on an unrealized gain this year, you get a credit for it so you don't get taxed again when you actually sell the asset later. It’s essentially the government asking for its cut early because they’re tired of waiting for billionaires to die and pass assets on via a "stepped-up basis."
Death, Taxes, and the $5 Million Exemption
Speaking of dying, the Harris plan looks at what happens to your assets when you pass away. Right now, there’s a loophole called the stepped-up basis.
If your grandma bought a house for $50,000 and it’s worth $1 million when she dies, you inherit it at the $1 million value. If you sell it the next day, you pay zero capital gains tax. The $950,000 in growth just... vanishes from the tax rolls.
Harris’s proposal would start taxing those gains at death, but with huge buffers:
- **$5 million** per person exemption ($10 million for couples).
- Special protections for family farms.
- Exemptions for primary residences (up to certain limits).
Basically, if you aren't leaving behind a massive estate, this won't touch you. But for the donor class, this is perhaps the most significant part of the entire plan. It ends the "buy, borrow, die" strategy where the wealthy live off loans against their stock and never trigger a taxable event.
What This Means for Your Strategy Right Now
Tax laws are never final until the ink is dry on a bill from Congress. However, the direction of the Harris capital gains tax tells us exactly where the winds are blowing. We are moving away from the rock-bottom rates of the late 2010s and toward a system that treats investment income more like "work" income.
If you are a high-net-worth investor, your window for "cheap" realizations might be closing. People are already looking at accelerating sales of appreciated assets to lock in the 20% rate before any potential 2026 shifts.
Actionable Steps for Investors
- Audit Your Unrealized Gains: If your income is approaching that $1 million mark, look at your portfolio. Selling in a year where your income is lower could save you 8% in federal tax alone.
- Re-evaluate Holding Periods: The gap between short-term and long-term rates might narrow. It makes the "one year and one day" rule less of a golden ticket than it used to be.
- Max Out Tax-Advantaged Buckets: Since 401(k)s and IRAs aren't subject to capital gains taxes, their value just skyrocketed. If you haven't maxed these out, you're leaving the best tax shield on the table.
- Consult a Pro on "Step-Up" Planning: If you were counting on the stepped-up basis to pass wealth to your kids, you need a Plan B. Irrevocable trusts or life insurance policies might become the new standard for covering future tax liabilities at death.
The bottom line is that the tax code is getting more "granular." The days of one-size-fits-all rates are ending. Whether you think it's "fair share" or "wealth redistribution," the cost of winning in the market is likely going up for those at the very top.
🔗 Read more: 3/1 ARM Mortgage Rates: Why People Are Looking at Them Again
Keep a close eye on the $400,000 income threshold. That's the real "line in the sand" for almost all the proposed changes, from the NIIT increase to the ordinary income tax brackets. If you're under that, you're mostly a spectator in this particular fight. If you're over it, it's time to get your CPA on speed dial.